Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10081
Authors: Kriege, Marc
Demare, Tim
Ruemmler, Robert
Schmidtmann, Irene
Wojciechowski, Janosh
Busch, Anneke
Ott, Thomas
Title: Exchange of a tracheal tube and supraglottic airway device : evaluation of different techniques in three simulated airway scenarios (TUBE Study) : a prospective, randomised controlled study
Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
Year of first publication: 2023
Language: english
Abstract: Background: The swapping of a supraglottic airway device or a tracheal tube in anaesthetised adult patients is a challenging procedure because potential complications through hypoxemia and loss of airway may occur, with life-threatening implications. This study aims to evaluate which airway technique offers the highest success rate concerning a secure airway in established supraglottic airway and tracheal tube airway exchange scenarios. Methods: After ethical approval, anaesthesiologists were randomised 1:1 into simulated scenarios: an LTS group (malpositioned laryngeal tube) and a Cuff group (relevant cuff leakage of a placed tracheal tube). After that, both groups completed a common scenario consisting of a partially obstructed tracheal tube lumen in a fixed prone position with a Mayfield clamp. The primary endpoint was a successful tracheal airway exchange within ten minutes after the start of the scenario and before severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 80%) arose. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors influencing success after 10 min. Results: In total, 60 anaesthesiologists (LTS group n = 30; Cuff group n = 30) with a median experience of 7 years (IQR 4-11) were observed. Within 10 min, a malpositioned laryngeal tube was successfully exchanged by 27/30 (90%) participants, compared to the exchange of a tracheal tube with a relevant cuff leakage by 29/30 (97%; p > 0.05). An airway exchange in an obstructed tube scenario occurred in 22/59 (37%). Loss of airway maintenance showed an obvious association with failure in the common scenario (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The results of this simulation-based study reflect that the exchange of an existing but insufficient airway device in clinical practice is a high-risk procedure. Especially in a fixed prone position, the deliberate evaluation of the existing airway patency and well-conceived airway management in the case of the accidental loss of the airway or obstructed airway access are crucial.
DDC: 610 Medizin
610 Medical sciences
Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department: FB 04 Medizin
Place: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10081
Version: Published version
Publication type: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Document type specification: Scientific article
License: CC BY
Information on rights of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine
13
1
Pages or article number: 16
Publisher: MDPI
Publisher place: Basel
Issue date: 2023
ISSN: 2077-0383
Publisher DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010016
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
exchange_of_a_tracheal_tube_a-20240214143341843.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open