Exchange of a tracheal tube and supraglottic airway device : evaluation of different techniques in three simulated airway scenarios (TUBE Study) : a prospective, randomised controlled study

dc.contributor.authorKriege, Marc
dc.contributor.authorDemare, Tim
dc.contributor.authorRuemmler, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchmidtmann, Irene
dc.contributor.authorWojciechowski, Janosh
dc.contributor.authorBusch, Anneke
dc.contributor.authorOtt, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T11:29:49Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T11:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: The swapping of a supraglottic airway device or a tracheal tube in anaesthetised adult patients is a challenging procedure because potential complications through hypoxemia and loss of airway may occur, with life-threatening implications. This study aims to evaluate which airway technique offers the highest success rate concerning a secure airway in established supraglottic airway and tracheal tube airway exchange scenarios. Methods: After ethical approval, anaesthesiologists were randomised 1:1 into simulated scenarios: an LTS group (malpositioned laryngeal tube) and a Cuff group (relevant cuff leakage of a placed tracheal tube). After that, both groups completed a common scenario consisting of a partially obstructed tracheal tube lumen in a fixed prone position with a Mayfield clamp. The primary endpoint was a successful tracheal airway exchange within ten minutes after the start of the scenario and before severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 80%) arose. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of factors influencing success after 10 min. Results: In total, 60 anaesthesiologists (LTS group n = 30; Cuff group n = 30) with a median experience of 7 years (IQR 4-11) were observed. Within 10 min, a malpositioned laryngeal tube was successfully exchanged by 27/30 (90%) participants, compared to the exchange of a tracheal tube with a relevant cuff leakage by 29/30 (97%; p > 0.05). An airway exchange in an obstructed tube scenario occurred in 22/59 (37%). Loss of airway maintenance showed an obvious association with failure in the common scenario (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The results of this simulation-based study reflect that the exchange of an existing but insufficient airway device in clinical practice is a high-risk procedure. Especially in a fixed prone position, the deliberate evaluation of the existing airway patency and well-conceived airway management in the case of the accidental loss of the airway or obstructed airway access are crucial.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10081
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/10099
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleExchange of a tracheal tube and supraglottic airway device : evaluation of different techniques in three simulated airway scenarios (TUBE Study) : a prospective, randomised controlled studyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue1de
jgu.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicinede
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative16de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/jcm13010016de
jgu.publisher.issn2077-0383de
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.year2023
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.subject.dfgMultidisciplinaryde
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
exchange_of_a_tracheal_tube_a-20240214143341843.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections