Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9462
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWessels, Marlene-
dc.contributor.authorHecht, Heiko-
dc.contributor.authorHuisman, Thirsa-
dc.contributor.authorOberfeld, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T10:14:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-28T10:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9480-
dc.description.abstractWhen judging the time-to-collision (TTC) of visually presented accelerating vehicles, untrained observers do not adequately account for acceleration (second-order information). Instead, their estimations only rely on vehicle distance and velocity (first-order information). As a result, they systemically overestimate the TTC for accelerating objects, which represents a potential risk for pedestrians in traffic situations because it might trigger unsafe road-crossing behavior. Can training help reduce these estimation errors? In this study, we tested whether training with trial-by-trial feedback about the signed deviation of the estimated from the actual TTC can improve TTC estimation accuracy for accelerating vehicles. Using a prediction-motion paradigm, we measured the estimated TTCs of twenty participants for constant-velocity and accelerated vehicle approaches, from a pedestrian’s perspective in a VR traffic simulation. The experiment included three blocks, of which only the second block provided trial-by-trial feedback about the TTC estimation accuracy. Participants adjusted their estimations during and after the feedback, but they failed to differentiate between accelerated and constant-velocity approaches. Thus, the feedback did not help them account for acceleration. The results suggest that a safety training program based on trial-by-trial feedback is not a promising countermeasure against pedestrians’ erroneous TTC estimation for accelerating objects.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleTrial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimationen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9462-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titlePLOS ONEde
jgu.journal.volume18de
jgu.journal.issue8de
jgu.pages.alternativee0288206de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.namePLOSde
jgu.publisher.placeSan Francisco, California, USde
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0288206de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgGeistes- und Sozialwissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
trialbytrial_feedback_fails_t-20230821143622446.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open