Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9462
Authors: Wessels, Marlene
Hecht, Heiko
Huisman, Thirsa
Oberfeld, Daniel
Title: Trial-by-trial feedback fails to improve the consideration of acceleration in visual time-to-collision estimation
Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
Year of first publication: 2023
Language: english
Abstract: When judging the time-to-collision (TTC) of visually presented accelerating vehicles, untrained observers do not adequately account for acceleration (second-order information). Instead, their estimations only rely on vehicle distance and velocity (first-order information). As a result, they systemically overestimate the TTC for accelerating objects, which represents a potential risk for pedestrians in traffic situations because it might trigger unsafe road-crossing behavior. Can training help reduce these estimation errors? In this study, we tested whether training with trial-by-trial feedback about the signed deviation of the estimated from the actual TTC can improve TTC estimation accuracy for accelerating vehicles. Using a prediction-motion paradigm, we measured the estimated TTCs of twenty participants for constant-velocity and accelerated vehicle approaches, from a pedestrian’s perspective in a VR traffic simulation. The experiment included three blocks, of which only the second block provided trial-by-trial feedback about the TTC estimation accuracy. Participants adjusted their estimations during and after the feedback, but they failed to differentiate between accelerated and constant-velocity approaches. Thus, the feedback did not help them account for acceleration. The results suggest that a safety training program based on trial-by-trial feedback is not a promising countermeasure against pedestrians’ erroneous TTC estimation for accelerating objects.
DDC: 150 Psychologie
150 Psychology
Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department: FB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sport
Place: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9462
Version: Published version
Publication type: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Document type specification: Scientific article
License: CC BY
Information on rights of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal: PLOS ONE
18
8
Pages or article number: e0288206
Publisher: PLOS
Publisher place: San Francisco, California, US
Issue date: 2023
Publisher DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288206
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
trialbytrial_feedback_fails_t-20230821143622446.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open