Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8073
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMolenaar, Carin-
dc.contributor.authorBlessin, Manpreet-
dc.contributor.authorErfurth, Luise M.-
dc.contributor.authorImhoff, Roland-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T08:42:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T08:42:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8088-
dc.description.abstractAlthough resilience is a multi-level process, research largely focuses on the individual and little is known about how resilience may distinctly present at the group level. Even less is known about subjective conceptualizations of resilience at either level. Therefore, two studies sought to better understand how individuals conceptualize resilience both as an individual and as a group. Study 1 (N = 123) experimentally manipulated whether participants reported on either individual or group-based responses to real stressors and analysed their qualitative responses. For individual responses, subjective resilience featured active coping most prominently, whereas social support was the focus for group-based responses. As these differences might be attributable to the different stressors people remembered in either condition, Study 2 (N = 171) held a hypothetical stressor (i.e., natural disaster) constant. As expected, resilience at the group level emphasized maintaining group cohesion. Surprisingly, the group condition also reported increased likelihood to engage in blame, denial, and behavioural disengagement. Contrary to expectations, participants in the individual condition reported stronger desire to seek out new groups. The combined findings are discussed within the framework of resilience and social identity and highlight the necessity of accounting for multiple levels and subjective conceptualizations of resilience.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleWere we stressed or was it just me – and does it even matter? : Efforts to disentangle individual and collective resilience within real and imagined stressorsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8073-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleThe British journal of social psychologyde
jgu.journal.volume61de
jgu.journal.issue1de
jgu.pages.start167de
jgu.pages.end191de
jgu.publisher.year2022-
jgu.publisher.nameWileyde
jgu.publisher.placeHoboken, NJ u.a.de
jgu.publisher.issn2044-8309de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1111/bjso.12475de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
were_we_stressed_or_was_it_ju-20221017120814393.pdf588.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open