Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7828
Authors: | Binder, Harald Kurz, Thorsten Teschner, Sven Kreutz, Clemens Geyer, Marcel Donauer, Johannes Kraemer-Guth, Annette Timmer, Jens Schumacher, Martin Walz, Gerd |
Title: | Dealing with prognostic signature instability : a strategy illustrated for cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease |
Online publication date: | 5-Oct-2022 |
Year of first publication: | 2016 |
Language: | english |
Abstract: | Background Identification of prognostic gene expression markers from clinical cohorts might help to better understand disease etiology. A set of potentially important markers can be automatically selected when linking gene expression covariates to a clinical endpoint by multivariable regression models and regularized parameter estimation. However, this is hampered by instability due to selection from many measurements. Stability can be assessed by resampling techniques, which might guide modeling decisions, such as choice of the model class or the specific endpoint definition. Methods We specifically propose a strategy for judging the impact of different endpoint definitions, endpoint updates, different approaches for marker selection, and exclusion of outliers. This strategy is illustrated for a study with end-stage renal disease patients, who experience a yearly mortality of more than 20 %, with almost 50 % sudden cardiac death or myocardial infarction. The underlying etiology is poorly understood, and we specifically point out how our strategy can help to identify novel prognostic markers and targets for therapeutic interventions. Results For markers such as the potentially prognostic platelet glycoprotein IIb, the endpoint definition, in combination with the signature building approach is seen to have the largest impact. Removal of outliers, as identified by the proposed strategy, is also seen to considerably improve stability. Conclusions As the proposed strategy allowed us to precisely quantify the impact of modeling choices on the stability of marker identification, we suggest routine use also in other applications to prevent analysis-specific results, which are unstable, i.e. not reproducible. |
DDC: | 610 Medizin 610 Medical sciences |
Institution: | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz |
Department: | FB 04 Medizin |
Place: | Mainz |
ROR: | https://ror.org/023b0x485 |
DOI: | http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7828 |
Version: | Published version |
Publication type: | Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
License: | CC BY |
Information on rights of use: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Journal: | BMC medical genomics 9 1 |
Pages or article number: | Art. 43 |
Publisher: | BioMed Central |
Publisher place: | London |
Issue date: | 2016 |
ISSN: | 1755-8794 |
Publisher URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0210-9 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1186/s12920-016-0210-9 |
Appears in collections: | DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dealing_with_prognostic_signa-20220914003115661.pdf | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |