Gutenberg Open Science: Comparison of rebound tonometry, Perkins applanation tonometry and ocular response analyser in mucopolysaccharidosis patients

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7358

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Wasielica-Poslednik, Joanna	-
dc.contributor.author	Butsch, Christina	-
dc.contributor.author	Lampe, Christina	-
dc.contributor.author	Elflein, Heike	-
dc.contributor.author	Lamparter, Julia	-
dc.contributor.author	Weyer, Veronika	-
dc.contributor.author	Pitz, Susanne	-
dc.date.accessioned	2022-07-12T07:17:51Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-07-12T07:17:51Z	-
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.identifier.uri	https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7372	-
dc.description.abstract	Aims To investigate the feasibility and to compare three devices measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in mucopolysaccharidosis patients (MPS): iCare rebound tonometer (RT), Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA) Methods MPS patients who underwent at least two examinations out of: RT, PAT and ORA at the same visit were identified and retrospectively analyzed in this study. Results 17 patients fulfilled the inclusion criterion. In all 17 patients IOP measurements were performed with RT (34 eyes) and ORA (33 eyes), while PAT measurement was possible in only 12 (24 eyes) patients. The RT, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) differed relevantly from IOP assessed with PAT. Corneal clouding in MPS patients correlated positively with PAT, RT and IOPg (r = 0.3, 0.5, and 0.5 respectively), but not with IOPcc (r = 0.07). The MPS-related corneal clouding correlated positively with biomechanical corneal parameters assessed with ORA: corneal hysteresis (r = 0.77) and corneal resistance factor (r = 0.77) either. Conclusions RT and ORA measurements were tolerated better than applanation tonometry in MPS patients. IOP measurements assessed with RT and ORA differed relevantly from PAT. Corneal-compensated IOP assessed with ORA seems to be less affected by the MPS-related corneal clouding than applanation or rebound tonometry. RT and ORA measurements should be preferred for IOP assessment in patients with MPS.	en_GB
dc.description.sponsorship	DFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizin	de
dc.language.iso	eng	de
dc.rights	CC BY	*
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject.ddc	610 Medizin	de_DE
dc.subject.ddc	610 Medical sciences	en_GB
dc.title	Comparison of rebound tonometry, Perkins applanation tonometry and ocular response analyser in mucopolysaccharidosis patients	en_GB
dc.type	Zeitschriftenaufsatz	de
dc.identifier.doi	http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7358	-
jgu.type.dinitype	article	en_GB
jgu.type.version	Published version	de
jgu.type.resource	Text	de
jgu.organisation.department	FB 04 Medizin	de
jgu.organisation.number	2700	-
jgu.organisation.name	Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz	-
jgu.rights.accessrights	openAccess	-
jgu.journal.title	PLoS one	de
jgu.journal.volume	10	de
jgu.journal.issue	8	de
jgu.pages.alternative	e0133586	de
jgu.publisher.year	2015	-
jgu.publisher.name	PLoS	de
jgu.publisher.place	Lawrence, Kan.	de
jgu.publisher.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133586	de
jgu.publisher.issn	1932-6203	de
jgu.organisation.place	Mainz	-
jgu.subject.ddccode	610	de
opus.date.modified	2017-05-12T09:11:42Z
opus.subject.dfgcode	00-000
opus.organisation.string	FB 04: Medizin: Augenklinik und Poliklinik	de_DE
opus.identifier.opusid	56519
opus.institute.number	0446
opus.metadataonly	false
opus.type.contenttype	Keine	de_DE
opus.type.contenttype	None	en_EN
opus.affiliated	Wasielica-Poslednik, Joanna
opus.affiliated	Elflein, Heike
opus.affiliated	Lamparter, Julia
opus.affiliated	Pitz, Susanne
jgu.publisher.doi	10.1371/journal.pone.0133586	de
jgu.organisation.ror	https://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:	DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:

	File	Description	Size	Format
	comparison_of_rebound_tonomet-20220710211533249.pdf		833.08 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show simple item record