Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7319
Authors: Bork, Konrad
Anderson, John T.
Caballero, Teresa
Craig, Timothy
Johnston, DouglasT.
Li, H. Henry
Longhurst, Hilary J.
Radojicic, Christine
Riedl, Marc A.
Title: Assessment and management of disease burden and quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema: a consensus report
Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
Year of first publication: 2021
Language: english
Abstract: BACKGROUND Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by unpredictable, potentially life-threatening attacks, resulting in significant physical and emotional burdens for patients and families. To optimize care for patients with HAE, an individualized management plan should be considered in partnership with the physician, requiring comprehensive assessment of the patient’s frequency and severity of attacks, disease burden, and therapeutic control. Although several guidelines and consensus papers have been published concerning the diagnosis and treatment of HAE, there has been limited specific clinical guidance on the assessment of disease burden and quality of life (QoL) in this patient population. Practical guidance is critical in supporting effective long-term clinical management of HAE and improving patient outcomes. The objective of this review is to provide evidence-based guidelines for an individualized assessment of disease burden and QoL in patients with HAE. METHODS A consensus meeting was held on February 29, 2020, consisting of 9 HAE experts from the United States and Europe with extensive clinical experience in the treatment of HAE. Consensus statements were developed based on a preliminary literature review and discussions from the consensus meeting. RESULTS Final statements reflect the consensus of the expert panel and include the assessment of attack severity, evaluation of disease burden, and long-term clinical management of HAE caused by C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency. Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing HAE attack severity and frequency are available and valuable tools; however, attack frequency and severity are insufficient markers of disease severity unless they are evaluated in the broader context of the effect on an individual patient’s QoL. QoL assessments should be individualized for each patient and minimally, they should address the interference of HAE with work, school, social, family, and physical activity, along with access to and burden of HAE treatment. Advances in HAE therapies offer the opportunity for comprehensive, individualized treatment plans, allowing patients to achieve minimal attack burden with reduced disease and treatment burden. CONCLUSION This consensus report builds on existing guidelines by expanding the assessment of disease burden and QoL measures for patients with HAE.
DDC: 610 Medizin
610 Medical sciences
Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department: FB 04 Medizin
Place: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7319
Version: Published version
Publication type: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
License: CC BY
Information on rights of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal: Allergy, asthma and clinical immunology
17
Pages or article number: 40
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher place: London
Issue date: 2021
ISSN: 1710-1492
Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s13223-021-00537-2
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
assessment_and_management_of_-20220706114130666.pdf2.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open