Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-242
Authors: Lauterbach, Maximilian
Veranso-Libalah, Marie Claire
Sukhorukov, Alexander P.
Kadereit, Gudrun
Title: Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae)
Online publication date: 16-Dec-2019
Year of first publication: 2019
Language: english
Abstract: Aim Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano-Turanian floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi-arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought-adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions. Location Deserts and semi-deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia. Methods Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB-rbcL, trnQ-rps16, and ndhF-rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time-calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well-documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using "BioGeoBEARS" under the DEC model. Results Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano-Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with ITfr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II, which originated in the Western ITfr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean. Main conclusions Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the ITfr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.
DDC: 570 Biowissenschaften
570 Life sciences
Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department: FB 10 Biologie
Place: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-242
URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:77-publ-594756
Version: Published version
Publication type: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
License: CC BY
Information on rights of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal: Ecology and evolution
9
6
Pages or article number: 3539
3552
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publisher place: S.l.
Issue date: 2019
ISSN: 2045-7758
Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4987
Publisher DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4987
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
59475.pdf1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open