The controversial definition of normal toe alignment

dc.contributor.authorSchippers, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorDrees, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorGercek, Erol
dc.contributor.authorWunderlich, Felix
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRuckes, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T08:13:18Z
dc.date.available2023-08-17T08:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstract“Normal” and “abnormal” are frequently used in surgical planning and to evaluate surgical results of the forefoot. However, there is no objectifiable value of metatarsophalangeal angles (MTPAs) 2–5 in the dorsoplantar (DP) view with which to objectively evaluate lesser toe alignment. We aimed to determine which angles are considered to be “normal” by orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Thirty anonymized radiographs of feet were submitted twice in randomized order to determine the respective MTPAs 2–5. After six weeks, the anonymized radiographs and photographs of the same feet without apparent affiliation were presented again. The terms “normal,” “borderline normal,” and “abnormal” were assigned by the observers. Viewers considered MTP-2 alignment from 0° to −20° to be normal, and below −30° abnormal; MTP-3, 0° to −15° to be normal and below −30° abnormal; MTP-4, 0° to −10° normal and below −20° abnormal. Between 5° valgus and 15° varus was the range of MTP-5 recognized as normal. High intra-observer but low interobserver reliability with overall low correlation of clinical and radiographic aspects was observed. The assessment of the terms “normal” or “abnormal” are subject to a high degree of variation. Therefore, these terms should be used cautiously.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)|491381577|Open-Access-Publikationskosten 2022–2024 Universität Mainz - Universitätsmedizin
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9382
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9400
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleThe controversial definition of normal toe alignmenten_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.membershipMDPI (MDPI)
jgu.apc.netprice2400,26
jgu.apc.price2568,28
jgu.apc.taxrate7
jgu.dfg.year2023
jgu.journal.issue10
jgu.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicine
jgu.journal.volume12
jgu.nationalcurrency.eur2400,26
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative3509
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/jcm12103509
jgu.publisher.issn2077-0383
jgu.publisher.nameMDPI
jgu.publisher.placeBasel
jgu.publisher.year2023
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articleen_GB
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
the_controversial_definition_-20230814145423350.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.98 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections