Digital transformation in musculoskeletal ultrasound : acceptability of blended learning

dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Andreas Michael
dc.contributor.authorBerthold, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorSchamberger, Christian
dc.contributor.authorVieth, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBalser, Gerd
dc.contributor.authorBerthold, Svenja
dc.contributor.authorStein, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorMerkel, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRecker, Florian
dc.contributor.authorSchmidmaier, Gerhard
dc.contributor.authorRink, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorKünzel, Julian
dc.contributor.authorKloeckner, Roman
dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T10:44:10Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T10:44:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: ultrasound diagnostics have a broad spectrum of applications, including among diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Accordingly, it is important for the users to have a well-founded and up-to-date education in this dynamic examination method. The right balance between online and in-class teaching still needs to be explored in this context. Certifying institutions are currently testing digitally transformed teaching concepts to provide more evidence. Methods: this study compared two musculoskeletal ultrasound blended learning models. Model A was more traditional, with a focus on in-person teaching, while Model B was more digitally oriented with compulsory webinar. Both used e-learning for preparation. Participants completed evaluations using a seven-point Likert scale, later converted to a 0–1 scale. Digital teaching media (e-learning) were used for preparation in both courses. Results: the analysis included n = 41 evaluations for Model A and n = 30 for Model B. Model B received a better overall assessment (median: 0.73 vs. 0.69, p = 0.05). Model B also excelled in “course preparation” (p = 0.02), “webinar quality” (p = 0.04), and “course concept” (p = 0.04). The “gain of competence” (p = 0.82), “learning materials” (p = 0.30), and “tutor quality” (p = 0.28) showed no significant differences. Conclusion: participants favorably assessed blended learning in ultrasound teaching. Certifying institutions should consider accrediting models that combine digital methods (e.g., internet lectures/webinars) and materials (e.g., e-learning) with hands-on ultrasound training. Further research is needed to validate these subjective findings for a stronger evidential basis.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10052
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/10070
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDigital transformation in musculoskeletal ultrasound : acceptability of blended learningen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue20de
jgu.journal.titleDiagnosticsde
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative3272de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/diagnostics13203272de
jgu.publisher.issn2075-4418de
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.year2023
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.subject.dfgMultidisciplinaryde
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
digital_transformation_in_mus-20240205171836318.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections