Any progress in informed consenting for cancer treatment? : Results from a cross sectional analysis at a comprehensive cancer center

dc.contributor.authorSchwaegermann, Marie-Kristin
dc.contributor.authorSchranz, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorMoehler, Markus
dc.contributor.authorLabenz, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMoringlane, Alice
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorTheobald, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorHess, Georg
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T10:12:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-16T10:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose Informed consent is required prior to any medical procedure. In the context of cancer treatment, special efforts are needed to inform cancer patients properly about treatment, potential sequelae and alternative therapies. Little is known about the effectiveness of current informed consent strategies and patients’ individual satisfaction. Given the heterogeneity in terms of age, education, sex and other factors, detailed understanding of patients’ comprehension and perception is the basis for further optimization of the informed consent process, which was the aim of the current investigation. Methods Patients with a new cancer diagnosis and recent informed consent were asked to complete a questionnaire about satisfaction, comprehension, time management, physician–patient relationship and other items of the informed consent process. Patients were followed for 6 months and invited to complete a follow-up questionnaire. Results In total, 89 patients completed the first questionnaire and 52 the follow-up questionnaire. Subjective understanding was assumed high, however, this did not correlate with objective understanding. Age and education were identified as influencing factors for comprehension. 85% of the patients were satisfied with the information provided. A major gap was the information on alternative therapies. Moreover, not all patients perceived the consent dialog as such, and particularly the individual treatment intention partially remained unclear for some patients. Conclusions To ensure that informed consent is based on solid understanding, informed consenting must be patient-centered and consider the individual expectations, needs and abilities of cancer patients. Further studies are required to develop tailored informed consent strategies.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7556
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7570
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleAny progress in informed consenting for cancer treatment? : Results from a cross sectional analysis at a comprehensive cancer centeren_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.membershipkeine
jgu.apc.pricePAR-Fee
jgu.apc.taxrate0
jgu.apc.transformationcontractkein
jgu.journal.titleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology
jgu.journal.volume147
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.end2126
jgu.pages.start2117
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00432-020-03495-1
jgu.publisher.issn1432-1335
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin u.a.
jgu.publisher.year2021
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
any_progress_in_informed_cons-20220812155755800.pdf
Size:
862.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: