Dental microwear texture analysis correlations in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and sheep (Ovis aries) suggest that dental microwear texture signal consistency is species-specific

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Louise Francoise
dc.contributor.authorWinkler, Daniela Eileen
dc.contributor.authorAckermans, Nicole Lauren
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Jaqueline
dc.contributor.authorTütken, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorCodron, Daryl
dc.contributor.authorSchulz-Kornas, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorHatt, Jean-Michel
dc.contributor.authorClauss, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-14T08:21:54Z
dc.date.available2025-05-14T08:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractDental microwear texture (DMT) analysis is used to differentiate abrasive dental wear patterns in many species fed different diets. Because DMT parameters all describe the same surface, they are expected to correlate with each other distinctively. Here, we explore the data range of, and correlations between, DMT parameters to increase the understanding of how this group of proxies records wear within and across species. The analysis was based on subsets of previously published DMT analyses in guinea pigs, sheep, and rabbits fed either a natural whole plant diet (lucerne, grass, bamboo) or pelleted diets with or without added quartz abrasives (guinea pigs and rabbits: up to 45 days, sheep: 17 months). The normalized DMT parameter range (P4: 0.69 ± 0.25; M2: 0.83 ± 0.16) and correlation coefficients (P4: 0.50 ± 0.31; M2: 0.63 ± 0.31) increased along the tooth row in guinea pigs, suggesting that strong correlations may be partially explained by data range. A comparison between sheep and guinea pigs revealed a higher DMT data range in sheep (0.93 ± 0.16; guinea pigs: 0.47 ± 0.29), but this did not translate into more substantial correlation coefficients (sheep: 0.35 ± 0.28; guinea pigs: 0.55 ± 0.32). Adding rabbits to an interspecies comparison of low abrasive dental wear (pelleted lucerne diet), the softer enamel of the hypselodont species showed a smaller data range for DMT parameters (guinea pigs 0.49 ± 0.32, rabbit 0.19 ± 0.18, sheep 0.78 ± 0.22) but again slightly higher correlations coefficients compared to the hypsodont teeth (guinea pigs 0.55 ± 0.31, rabbits 0.56 ± 0.30, sheep 0.42 ± 0.27). The findings suggest that the softer enamel of fast-replaced ever-growing hypselodont cheek teeth shows a greater inherent wear trace consistency, whereas the harder enamel of permanent and non-replaced enamel of hypsodont ruminant teeth records less coherent wear patterns. Because consistent diets were used across taxa, this effect cannot be ascribed to the random overwriting of individual wear traces on the more durable hypsodont teeth. This matches literature reports on reduced DMT pattern consistency on harder materials; possibly, individual wear events become more random in nature on harder material. Given the species-specific differences in enamel characteristics, the findings suggest a certain species-specificity of DMT patterns.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-12178
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/12199
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc560 Paläontologiede
dc.subject.ddc560 Paleontologyen
dc.titleDental microwear texture analysis correlations in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and sheep (Ovis aries) suggest that dental microwear texture signal consistency is species-specificen
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz
elements.depositor.primary-group-descriptorFachbereich Chemie, Pharmazie und Geowissenschaften
elements.object.id287345
elements.object.labelsdental microwear texture analysis
elements.object.labelsrodent
elements.object.labelsruminant
elements.object.labelsphytolith
elements.object.labelsquartz abrasive
elements.object.labelsfeeding experiment
elements.object.labels0602 Ecology
elements.object.labels0603 Evolutionary Biology
elements.object.labels3103 Ecology
elements.object.labels3104 Evolutionary biology
elements.object.labels4102 Ecological applications
elements.object.typejournal-article
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution
jgu.journal.volume10
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 09 Chemie, Pharmazie u. Geowissensch.
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number7950
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative958576
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fevo.2022.958576
jgu.publisher.eissn2296-701X
jgu.publisher.issn2296-701X
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Media SA
jgu.publisher.year2022
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode560
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.type.versionPublished version

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dental_microwear_texture_anal-20250514102154071609.pdf
Size:
9.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.1 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: