What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?
| dc.contributor.author | Tripke, Verena | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lozanovski, Vladimir J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mann, Carolina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lang, Hauke | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grimminger, Peter P. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-16T09:01:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-16T09:01:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associa | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-11239 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/11260 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | de |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 | * |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medizin | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medical sciences | en_GB |
| dc.title | What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer? | en_GB |
| dc.type | Zeitschriftenaufsatz | de |
| jgu.journal.title | Innovative surgical sciences | de |
| jgu.journal.volume | Version of Record (VoR) | de |
| jgu.organisation.department | FB 04 Medizin | de |
| jgu.organisation.name | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.number | 2700 | |
| jgu.organisation.place | Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.ror | https://ror.org/023b0x485 | |
| jgu.publisher.doi | 10.1515/iss-2023-0021 | de |
| jgu.publisher.issn | 2364-7485 | de |
| jgu.publisher.name | De Gruyter | de |
| jgu.publisher.place | Berlin | de |
| jgu.publisher.year | 2024 | |
| jgu.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
| jgu.subject.ddccode | 610 | de |
| jgu.subject.dfg | Lebenswissenschaften | de |
| jgu.type.contenttype | Review | de |
| jgu.type.dinitype | Article | en_GB |
| jgu.type.resource | Text | de |
| jgu.type.version | Published version | de |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- what_is_the_best_surgical_app-20250116095942739.pdf
- Size:
- 217.96 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 3.57 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: