What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?

dc.contributor.authorTripke, Verena
dc.contributor.authorLozanovski, Vladimir J.
dc.contributor.authorMann, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorLang, Hauke
dc.contributor.authorGrimminger, Peter P.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T09:01:17Z
dc.date.available2025-01-16T09:01:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractEsophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associaen_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-11239
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/11260
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleWhat is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?en_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.netprice0,00
jgu.apc.price0,00
jgu.apc.taxrate19
jgu.dfg.year2024
jgu.journal.titleInnovative surgical sciences
jgu.journal.volumeVersion of Record (VoR)
jgu.nationalcurrency.eur0,00
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.publisher.doi10.1515/iss-2023-0021
jgu.publisher.issn2364-7485
jgu.publisher.nameDe Gruyter
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin
jgu.publisher.year2024
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.contenttypeReviewen_GB
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
what_is_the_best_surgical_app-20250116095942739.pdf
Size:
217.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections