Development and integration of DOPS as formative tests in head and neck ultrasound education : proof of concept study for exploration of perceptions

dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Johannes Matthias
dc.contributor.authorRink, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorDirks, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorIlle, Carlotta
dc.contributor.authorBozzato, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorSproll, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorWeimer, Andreas Michael
dc.contributor.authorNeubert, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBuggenhagen, Holger
dc.contributor.authorErnst, Benjamin Philipp
dc.contributor.authorSymeou, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorLorenz, Liv Annebritt
dc.contributor.authorHollinderbäumer, Anke
dc.contributor.authorKünzel, Julian
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T07:47:17Z
dc.date.available2023-08-17T07:47:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn Germany, progress assessments in head and neck ultrasonography training have been carried out mainly theoretically and lack standardisation. Thus, quality assurance and comparisons between certified courses from various course providers are difficult. This study aimed to develop and integrate a direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in head and neck ultrasound education and explore the perceptions of both participants and examiners. Five DOPS tests oriented towards assessing basic skills were developed for certified head and neck ultrasound courses on national standards. DOPS tests were completed by 76 participants from basic and advanced ultrasound courses (n = 168 documented DOPS tests) and evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. Ten examiners performed and evaluated the DOPS after detailed training. The variables of “general aspects” (6.0 Scale Points (SP) vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.71), “test atmosphere” (6.3 SP vs. 6.4 SP; p = 0.92), and “test task setting” (6.2 SP vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.12) were positively evaluated by all participants and examiners. There were no significant differences between a basic and advanced course in relation to the overall results of DOPS tests (p = 0.81). Regardless of the courses, there were significant differences in the total number of points achieved between individual DOPS tests. DOPS tests are accepted by participants and examiners as an assessment tool in head and neck ultrasound education. In view of the trend toward “competence-based” teaching, this type of test format should be applied and validated in the future.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)|491381577|Open-Access-Publikationskosten 2022–2024 Universität Mainz - Universitätsmedizin
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9380
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9398
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDevelopment and integration of DOPS as formative tests in head and neck ultrasound education : proof of concept study for exploration of perceptionsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue4de
jgu.journal.titleDiagnosticsde
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative661de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/diagnostics13040661de
jgu.publisher.issn2075-4418de
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040661de
jgu.publisher.year2023
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaftende
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
development_and_integration_o-20230814132906640.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.98 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections