Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery
| dc.contributor.author | Huettl, Florentine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lang, Hauke | |
| dc.contributor.author | Paschold, Markus | |
| dc.contributor.author | Watzka, F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wachter, Nicolas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hensel, Benjamin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kneist, Werner | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huber, Tobias | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-14T08:35:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-14T08:35:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE In advanced minimally invasive surgery the laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) quality can influence the flow of the operation. This study aimed to investigate the applicability of a scoring system for LCN (SALAS score) in colorectal surgery and whether an adequate scoring can be achieved using a specified sequence of the operation. METHODS The score was assessed by four blinded raters using synchronized video and voice recordings of 20 randomly selected laparoscopic colorectal surgeries (group A: assessment of the entire operation; group B: assessment of the 2nd and 3rd quartile). Experience in LCN was defined as at least 100 assistances in complex laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS The surgical teams consisted of three residents, three fellows, and two attendings forming 15 different teams. The ratio between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants was balanced (n = 11 vs. n = 9). Regarding the total SALAS score, the four raters discriminated between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants, regardless of their group assignment (group A, p < 0.05; group B, p < 0.05). The score’s interrater variability and reliability were proven with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. No statistically relevant correlation was achieved between operation time and SALAS score. CONCLUSION This study presents the first intraoperative, objective, and structured assessment of LCN in colorectal surgery. We could demonstrate that the SALAS score is a reliable tool for the assessment of LCN even when only the middle part (50%) of the procedure is analyzed. Construct validity was proven by discriminating between experienced and inexperienced camera assistants. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6066 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/6075 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | de |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 | * |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medizin | de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medical sciences | en_GB |
| dc.title | Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery | en_GB |
| dc.type | Zeitschriftenaufsatz | de |
| jgu.journal.title | International journal of colorectal disease | de |
| jgu.journal.volume | 35 | de |
| jgu.organisation.department | FB 04 Medizin | de |
| jgu.organisation.name | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.number | 2700 | |
| jgu.organisation.place | Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.ror | https://ror.org/023b0x485 | |
| jgu.pages.end | 1115 | de |
| jgu.pages.start | 1111 | de |
| jgu.publisher.doi | 10.1007/s00384-020-03543-9 | |
| jgu.publisher.issn | 1432-1262 | de |
| jgu.publisher.name | Springer | de |
| jgu.publisher.place | Berlin u.a. | de |
| jgu.publisher.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03543-9 | de |
| jgu.publisher.year | 2020 | |
| jgu.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
| jgu.subject.ddccode | 610 | de |
| jgu.type.dinitype | Article | en_GB |
| jgu.type.resource | Text | de |
| jgu.type.version | Published version | de |