Development, validity and reliability of the systematic screening for handwriting difficulties tool 

dc.contributor.authorFarhat, Faiçal
dc.contributor.authorAmmar, Achraf
dc.contributor.authorKammoun, Mohamed Moncef
dc.contributor.authorMezghani, Nourhen
dc.contributor.authorTrabelsi, Khaled
dc.contributor.authorJahrami, Haitham
dc.contributor.authorGharbi, Adnene
dc.contributor.authorRebai, Haithem
dc.contributor.authorMoalla, Wassim
dc.contributor.authorKammoun, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorTriki, Chahnez
dc.contributor.authorSmits-Engelsman, Bouwien
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T08:24:22Z
dc.date.available2024-11-05T08:24:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study was to develop an Arabic handwriting screening test and establish its psychometric properties. Methods: Handwriting quality was evaluated using seven criteria from the Systematic Screening for Handwriting Difficulties Arabic (SOS-ARB) and writing speed were measured by counting the number of letters produced in 5 minutes. Construct validity was evaluated using hypothesis testing (learning disabilities, sex and age differences). Convergent validity was examined using data from 106 children with dysgraphia who were also administered the French version of the “Concise Assessment Methods of Children’s Handwriting” (BHK). Intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability were established for total and item scores. Results: Handwriting test data were collected from 1274 children (6–10 years) in regular education, of whom 194 were diagnosed with Learning Disabilities (LD). The SOS-ARB scores differed between children with and without LD (F (1, 1273) = 330.90, p <.001, η2 = 0.209), males and females, and different age groups. In addition, significant differences in writing speed were shown between children with and without LD (F (1, 1273) = 60.26, p <0.001, η2 = 0.046), between females and males (F (1, 1273) = 7.57, p =0.01, η2 = 0.006), and between the different age groups (F (4, 1270) = 21.762, p <0.001, η2 = 0.065). A correlation coefficient of 0.72 for the quality score between the SOS-ARB and BHK confirmed convergent validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent in terms of quality scores (ICC coefficients = 0.988 and 0.972, respectively) and letter speed (ICC coefficients = 0.993 and 0.990, respectively). The quality score and letter speed had excellent and good test-retest reliability (ICC co-efficient = 0.968 and 0.784, respectively). Conclusions: Results indicate that the SOS-ARB is a valid and reliable tool for scoring Arabic handwriting abilities in elementary school children.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-10877
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/10896
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.subject.ddc796 Sportde_DE
dc.subject.ddc796 Athletic and outdoor sports and gamesen_GB
dc.titleDevelopment, validity and reliability of the systematic screening for handwriting difficulties tool en_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.titleF1000Researchde
jgu.journal.volume13de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number7910
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative313de
jgu.publisher.doi10.12688/f1000research.149049.1de
jgu.publisher.issn2046-1402de
jgu.publisher.nameF1000Research Ltdde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.year2024
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.subject.ddccode796de
jgu.subject.dfgGeistes- und Sozialwissenschaftende
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
development_validity_and_reli-20241105092218196.pdf
Size:
974.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections