Cross-cultural validation of the profile of mood scale : evaluation of the psychometric properties of short screening versions

dc.contributor.authorSchmalbach, Ileana
dc.contributor.authorSchmalbach, Bjarne
dc.contributor.authorAghababa, Alireza
dc.contributor.authorBrand, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yu-Kai
dc.contributor.authorÇiftçi, Muhammet Cihat
dc.contributor.authorElsangedy, Hassan
dc.contributor.authorGavira, Jesús Fernández
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Zhijian
dc.contributor.authorKristjánsdóttir, Hafrún
dc.contributor.authorMallia, Luca
dc.contributor.authorNosrat, Sanaz
dc.contributor.authorPesce, Caterina
dc.contributor.authorRafnsson, Daði
dc.contributor.authorMedina Rebollo, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTimme, Sinika
dc.contributor.authorBrähler, Elmar
dc.contributor.authorPetrowski, Katja
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-22T10:15:51Z
dc.date.available2025-08-22T10:15:51Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe Profile of Mood States (POMS) is one of the most widely applied scales for measuring mood. Considering the advantages of short scales and increased international research, the aim of the present study was to evaluate cross-culturally the psychometric properties of a short 16-item version of the POMS. Data were collected from 15,693 participants across 10 different countries worldwide. Initially, we identified the original versions of the POMS in various languages. Subsequently, we selected 16 items based on the previously validated short form (POMS-16) for analysis. Psychometric properties of the POMS were then evaluated in samples from each studied population for each language version. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess its invariance across age groups and gender, alongside reliability estimation. Most language versions of the POMS-16 showed a good fit with the four-factor model, except for the Chinese (traditional) and Turkish versions. Reliability was generally high, except for the Vigor subscale in a small subset of languages. Regarding measurement invariance, the majority of language versions were invariant across gender and age groups, except for the Farsi language version across gender, and the Chinese, Farsi, Finnish, and Turkish versions across age. These findings enhance the cross-cultural applicability of the POMS-16, contributing to its utility in diverse populations and thus enhancing the comparability of the results. In addition, we introduced the first versions of the POMS in Farsi, Finnish, and Icelandic.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-12510
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/12531
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen
dc.titleCross-cultural validation of the profile of mood scale : evaluation of the psychometric properties of short screening versionsen
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in psychology
jgu.journal.volume16
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizin
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative1498717
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498717
jgu.publisher.eissn1664-1078
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Research Foundation
jgu.publisher.placeLausanne
jgu.publisher.year2025
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaften
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.type.versionPublished version

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
crosscultural_validation_of_t-20250822121551828611.pdf
Size:
424.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections