AI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants : comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AI

dc.contributor.authorBremer, Mark K.
dc.contributor.authorBlume, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Ayash, Samir
dc.contributor.authorBajwa, Muhammad Naseer
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Sheraz
dc.contributor.authorHardt, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorPetrowski, Katja
dc.contributor.authorBjelopavlovic, Monika
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T11:22:23Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose In dental implantology, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for the differentiation of various implant systems is gaining increasing importance. This study investigates the feasibility of distinguishing between two highly similar implant (original implant and its replica) systems using an automated, AI-based recognition software. Methods A dataset of 906 radiographic images was initially compiled, consisting of standardized ex situ recordings of both the original and the replica implants (with and without a cover screw in situ). Four deterministic AI-models and one probabilistic model were trained using different subsets of varying sizes of the dataset, including the full dataset and then evaluated against a designated test dataset. For comparison, 28 dental professionals also assessed the same test dataset. Results The accuracy of the deterministic model trained solely with 488 radiographs of implants with inserted cover screws was 0.579 (57.9%). The second and third models, trained with a greater number of radiographs without inserted cover screws, achieved accuracies exceeding 0.90 and, in some instances, even reached 1.00. The fourth deterministic model, as well as the probabilistic model, comprising 28 classifiers and trained on the complete dataset, classified the test dataset without error. The dental professionals achieved an overall accuracy of 0.8616 (86.16%) in their assessment of the test dataset. Conclusion This study suggests that AI-supported implant recognition software has the potential to offer valuable assistance in clinical practice for distinguishing between original and replica implants. Such differentiation can play a crucial role for prosthetic suprastructures and associated manufacturer warranties.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-14541
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/14562
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleAI-assisted radiographic identification of original vs. replica dental implants : comparing accuracy of human experts vs. probabilistic and deterministic AIen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.netprice1942,46
jgu.apc.price2078,43
jgu.apc.taxrate7
jgu.apc.transformationcontractSpringer (DEAL)
jgu.dfg.year2025
jgu.identifier.uuid5a7838d5-d43f-4421-af26-4d283b636b0b
jgu.journal.titleInternational journal of implant dentistry
jgu.journal.volume12
jgu.nationalcurrency.eur1942,46
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative1
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s40729-025-00662-2
jgu.publisher.eissn2198-4034
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin, Heidelberg
jgu.publisher.year2026
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aiassisted_radiographic_ident-20260226122223519258.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.14 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections