Comparison of two porcine acute lung injury models : a post-hoc analysis

dc.contributor.authorRissel, René
dc.contributor.authorRenz, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorMohnke, Katja
dc.contributor.authorRiedel, Julian
dc.contributor.authorRitter, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorZiebart, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorRuemmler, Robert
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Erik K.
dc.contributor.authorKamuf, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T11:10:05Z
dc.date.available2023-02-10T11:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common disease in intensive care medicine. Despite intensive research, mortality rates are high, not even in COVID-19 ARDS. Thereby, pigs offer some advantages to study the characteristics of ARDS. Many different ARDS models exist. Most of the articles published focused on histopathological and microscopic lung alterations to identify the most suitable animal ARDS model. “Macroscopic” observations and descriptions are often missing. Therefore, we performed a post-hoc comparison of two common ARDS models for pigs: lipopolysaccharide (LPS) vs. a double-hit model (bronchoalveolar lavage + oleic acid infusion). We investigated hemodynamic, spirometric and laboratory changes as another main clinical part of ARDS. Results The groups were compared by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Student–Newman–Keuls test. A p value lower than 0.05 was accepted as significant. All animals (n = 8 double-hit ARDS; n = 8 LPS ARDS) survived the observation period of 8 h. ARDS induction with reduced oxygen indices was successful performed in both models (76 ± 35/225 ± 54/212 ± 79 vs. 367 ± 64; T0/T4/T8 vs. BLH for double-hit; 238 ± 57/144 ± 59 vs. 509 ± 41; T4/T8 vs. BLH for LPS; p < 0.05). ARDS induced with LPS leads to more hemodynamic (mean arterial pulmonary pressure 35 ± 3/30 ± 3 vs. 28 ± 4/23 ± 4; T4/T8 LPS vs. double-hit; p < 0.05; doses of norepinephrine 1.18 ± 1.05 vs. 0.11 ± 0.16; LPS vs. double-hit for T8; p < 0.05) and inflammatory (pulmonary IL-6 expression: 2.41e−04 ± 1.08e−04 vs. 1.45e−05 ± 7.26e−06; LPS vs. double-hit; p < 0.05) alterations. ARDS induced by double-hit requires a more invasive ventilator strategy to maintain a sufficient oxygenation (PEEP at T4: 8 ± 3 vs. 6 ± 2; double-hit vs. LPS; p < 0.05). Conclusions Both animal ARDS models are feasible and are similar to human presentation of ARDS. If your respiratory research focus on hemodynamic/inflammation variables, the LPS-induced ARDS is a feasible model. Studying different ventilator strategies, the double-hit ARDS model offers a suitable approach.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8681
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8697
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleComparison of two porcine acute lung injury models : a post-hoc analysisen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.netprice1592,00
jgu.apc.price1894,48
jgu.apc.taxrate19
jgu.apc.transformationcontractSpringer (DEAL)
jgu.dfg.year2022
jgu.journal.titleIntensive Care Medicine Experimental
jgu.journal.volume10
jgu.nationalcurrency.eur1894,48
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative37
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s40635-022-00466-3
jgu.publisher.issn2197-425X
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerOpen
jgu.publisher.placeberlin
jgu.publisher.year2022
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articleen_GB
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
comparison_of_two_porcine_acu-20230127105834707.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections