Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults : a three-armed randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorKlan, Timo
dc.contributor.authorGaul, Charly
dc.contributor.authorLiesering-Latta, Eva
dc.contributor.authorBoth, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorHeld, Isabella
dc.contributor.authorHennemann, Severin
dc.contributor.authorWitthöft, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-31T09:47:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-31T09:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Behavioral approaches are central to the preventive treatment of migraine but empirical evidence regarding efficacy and effectiveness is still sparse. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed migraine-specific, integrative cognitive-behavioral therapy program (miCBT) combining several approaches (trigger and stress management, coping with fear of attacks, relaxation training) by comparing it with a single behavioral approach (relaxation training, RLX) as an active control group and a waiting-list control group (WLC). Methods: In a three-armed open-label randomized controlled trial, 121 adults with migraine were assigned to either miCBT, RLX or WLC. The outpatient group therapy (miCBT or RLX) consisted of seven sessions each 90 min. Participants who completed the WLC were subsequently randomized to one of the two treatment groups. Primary outcomes were headache days, headache-related disability, emotional distress, and self-efficacy. The baseline was compared to post-treatment, and followed by assessments 4- and 12-months post-treatment to compare miCBT and RLX. Results: Mixed-model analyses (intention-to-treat sample, 106 participants) showed significantly stronger pre-post improvements in self-efficacy (assessed by the Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale, HMSE-G-SF) in both treatment groups compared to the WLC (mean difference at post; miCBT: 4.67 [0.55–8.78], p = 0.027; RLX: 4.42 [0.38 to 8.46], p = 0.032), whereas no other significant between-group differences were observed. The follow-up analyses revealed significant within-group improvements from baseline to 12-month follow-up in all four primary outcomes for both treatments. However, between-group effects (miCBT vs. RLX) were not significant at follow-up. Conclusion: The miCBT has no better treatment effects compared to RLX in migraine-prophylaxis. Both treatments effectively increase patients' self-efficacy. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (www.drks.de; DRKS-ID: DRKS00011111).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8186
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8201
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleEfficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults : a three-armed randomized controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.netprice2064,49
jgu.apc.price2456,74
jgu.apc.taxrate19
jgu.dfg.year2022
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in neurology
jgu.journal.volume13
jgu.nationalcurrency.usd2655,00
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number7910
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative852616
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fneur.2022.852616
jgu.publisher.issn1664-2295
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Media
jgu.publisher.placeLausanne
jgu.publisher.year2022
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgGeistes- und Sozialwissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articleen_GB
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
efficacy_of_cognitivebehavior-20221026155846295.pdf
Size:
1.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections