CpG-islands as markers for liquid biopsies of cancer patients

dc.contributor.authorSprang, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorParet, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorFaber, Jörg
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T10:47:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-11T10:47:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe analysis of tumours using biomarkers in blood is transforming cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancers are characterised by evolving genetic alterations, making it difficult to develop reliable and broadly applicable DNA-based biomarkers for liquid biopsy. In contrast to the variability in gene mutations, the methylation pattern remains generally constant during carcinogenesis. Thus, methylation more than mutation analysis may be exploited to recognise tumour features in the blood of patients. In this work, we investigated the possibility of using global CpG (CpG means a CG motif in the context of methylation. The p represents the phosphate. This is used to distinguish CG sites meant for methylation from other CG motifs or from mentions of CG content) island methylation profiles as a basis for the prediction of cancer state of patients utilising liquid biopsy samples. We retrieved existing GEO methylation datasets on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from HCC patients and healthy donors, as well as healthy whole blood and purified peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples, and used a random forest classifier as a predictor. Additionally, we tested three different feature selection techniques in combination. When using cfDNA samples together with solid tumour samples and healthy blood samples of different origin, we could achieve an average accuracy of 0.98 in a 10-fold cross-validation. In this setting, all the feature selection methods we tested in this work showed promising results. We could also show that it is possible to use solid tumour samples and purified PBMCs as a training set and correctly predict a cfDNA sample as cancerous or healthy. In contrast to the complete set of samples, the feature selections led to varying results of the respective random forests. ANOVA feature selection worked well with this training set, and the selected features allowed the random forest to predict all cfDNA samples correctly. Feature selection based on mutual information could also lead to better than random results, but LASSO feature selection would not lead to a confident prediction. Our results show the relevance of CpG islands as tumour markers in blood. Keywords: liquid biopsy; CpG islands; HCCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizin Mainzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5486
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/5490
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc500 Naturwissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc500 Natural sciences and mathematicsen_GB
dc.subject.ddc570 Biowissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc570 Life sciencesen_GB
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleCpG-islands as markers for liquid biopsies of cancer patientsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue8de
jgu.journal.titleCellsde
jgu.journal.volume9de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative1820de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3390/cells9081820
jgu.publisher.issn2073-4409de
jgu.publisher.nameMDPIde
jgu.publisher.placeBaselde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081820de
jgu.publisher.year2020
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode500de
jgu.subject.ddccode570de
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sprang_maximilian-cpg-islands_as-20201209163016272.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: