The effectiveness of digital vs. analogue teaching resources in a flipped classroom for undergraduate focus cardiac ultrasound training : a prospective, randomised, controlled single-centre study
| dc.contributor.author | Weimer, Johannes | |
| dc.contributor.author | Recker, Florian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krüger, Rebecca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Müller, Lukas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Buggenhagen, Holger | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kurz, Sandra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Weimer, Andreas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lorenz, Liv-Annebritt | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kloeckner, Roman | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ruppert, Johannes | |
| dc.contributor.author | Waezsada, Elias | |
| dc.contributor.author | Göbel, Sebastian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Weinmann-Menke, Julia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-25T10:43:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This study investigated the effectiveness of e-learning compared to traditional teaching methods in ultrasound education, centring on a focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) course for third-year undergraduate medical students. With the rise of digital teaching methods, it is essential to evaluate their impact on the development of theoretical and practical skills in ultrasound training. Methods: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was conducted involving two groups of students participating in a one-day FoCUS course delivered in a flipped classroom format. The study group used e-learning resources, while the control group used hard-copy lecture notes. Assessments were conducted at three stages: before the course, during the preparation phase, and after the course. Evaluations included self-assessment surveys, theory tests, and practical exams using direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) tests. The study group had 15% less practice time compared to the control group. Results: A total of 109 complete datasets (study group, n = 52; control group, n = 57) were analysed. Both groups showed an equivalent initial level of and a continuous and significant (p < 0.01) increase in subjective and objective skills over the evaluated time frame. The study group achieved significantly (p = 0.03) higher results in DOPS (T2) than the control group. No significant differences were found in the total scores of the theory tests (T2 + T3) or DOPS (T3). Both groups rated their teaching materials, motivation, and the course concept in similarly high scale ranges. Conclusions: The findings suggest that e-learning is as effective as traditional methods in developing ultrasound skills and may serve as a viable alternative, even with reduced face-to-face interaction. These results indicate that accreditation processes could be applied similarly to those for traditional formats without requiring in-person training as a prerequisite for quality | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-13329 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/13350 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medizin | de |
| dc.subject.ddc | 610 Medical sciences | en |
| dc.title | The effectiveness of digital vs. analogue teaching resources in a flipped classroom for undergraduate focus cardiac ultrasound training : a prospective, randomised, controlled single-centre study | en |
| dc.type | Zeitschriftenaufsatz | |
| jgu.journal.issue | 7 | |
| jgu.journal.title | Education Sciences | |
| jgu.journal.volume | 15 | |
| jgu.organisation.department | FB 04 Medizin | |
| jgu.organisation.name | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.number | 2700 | |
| jgu.organisation.place | Mainz | |
| jgu.organisation.ror | https://ror.org/023b0x485 | |
| jgu.pages.alternative | 810 | |
| jgu.publisher.doi | 10.3390/educsci15070810 | |
| jgu.publisher.eissn | 2227-7102 | |
| jgu.publisher.name | MDPI | |
| jgu.publisher.place | Basel | |
| jgu.publisher.year | 2025 | |
| jgu.rights.accessrights | openAccess | |
| jgu.subject.ddccode | 610 | |
| jgu.subject.dfg | Lebenswissenschaften | |
| jgu.type.contenttype | Scientific article | |
| jgu.type.dinitype | Article | en_GB |
| jgu.type.resource | Text | |
| jgu.type.version | Published version |