Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
Autoren: Stoffers-Winterling, Jutta M.
Storebø, Ole Jakob
Kongerslev, Mickey T.
Faltinsen, Erlend
Todorovac, Adan
Jørgensen, Mie Sedoc
Sales, Christian P.
Edemann Callesen, Henriette
Pereira Ribeiro, Johanne
Völlm, Birgit A.
Lieb, Klaus
Simonsen, Erik
Titel: Psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder : a focused systematic review and meta-analysis
Online-Publikationsdatum: 3-Mai-2023
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Sprache des Dokuments: Englisch
Zusammenfassung/Abstract: Background: A recently updated Cochrane review supports the efficacy of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Aims: To evaluate the effects of standalone and add-on psychotherapeutic treatments more concisely. Method: We applied the same methods as the 2020 Cochrane review, but focused on adult samples and comparisons of active treatments and unspecific control conditions. Standalone treatments (i.e. necessarily including individual psychotherapy as either the sole or one of several treatment components) and add-on interventions (i.e. complementing any ongoing individual BPD treatment) were analysed separately. Primary outcomes were BPD severity, self-harm, suicide-related outcomes and psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes were remaining BPD diagnostic criteria, depression and attrition. Results: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials totalling 1870 participants were identified. Among standalone treatments, statistically significant effects of low overall certainty were observed for dialectical behaviour therapy (self-harm: standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.54, P = 0.006; psychosocial functioning: SMD −0.51, P = 0.01) and mentalisation-based treatment (self-harm: risk ratio 0.51, P < 0.0007; suicide-related outcomes: risk ratio 0.10, P < 0.0001). For adjunctive interventions, moderate-quality evidence of beneficial effects was observed for DBT skills training (BPD severity: SMD −0.66, P = 0.002; psychosocial functioning: SMD −0.45, P = 0.002), and statistically significant low-certainty evidence was observed for the emotion regulation group (BPD severity: mean difference −8.49, P < 0.00001), manual-assisted cognitive therapy (self-harm: mean difference −3.03, P = 0.03; suicide-related outcomes: SMD −0.96, P = 0.005) and the systems training for emotional predictability and problem-solving (BPD severity: SMD −0.48, P = 0.002). Conclusions: There is reasonable evidence to conclude that psychotherapeutic interventions are helpful for individuals with BPD. Replication studies are needed to enhance the certainty of findings.
DDC-Sachgruppe: 150 Psychologie
150 Psychology
610 Medizin
610 Medical sciences
Veröffentlichende Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Organisationseinheit: FB 04 Medizin
Veröffentlichungsort: Mainz
Version: Published version
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Weitere Angaben zur Dokumentart: Scientific article
Nutzungsrechte: CC BY
Informationen zu den Nutzungsrechten:
Zeitschrift: The British Journal of Psychiatry
Seitenzahl oder Artikelnummer: 538
Verlag: Cambridge University Press
Verlagsort: Cambridge
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
ISSN: 1472-1465
DOI der Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1192/bjp.2021.204
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:DFG-491381577-H

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
  Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat
psychotherapies_for_borderlin-20230223095306012.pdf664.96 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen