Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8847
Authors: Stoffers-Winterling, Jutta M.
Storebø, Ole Jakob
Kongerslev, Mickey T.
Faltinsen, Erlend
Todorovac, Adan
Jørgensen, Mie Sedoc
Sales, Christian P.
Edemann Callesen, Henriette
Pereira Ribeiro, Johanne
Völlm, Birgit A.
Lieb, Klaus
Simonsen, Erik
Title: Psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder : a focused systematic review and meta-analysis
Online publication date: 3-May-2023
Year of first publication: 2022
Language: english
Abstract: Background: A recently updated Cochrane review supports the efficacy of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Aims: To evaluate the effects of standalone and add-on psychotherapeutic treatments more concisely. Method: We applied the same methods as the 2020 Cochrane review, but focused on adult samples and comparisons of active treatments and unspecific control conditions. Standalone treatments (i.e. necessarily including individual psychotherapy as either the sole or one of several treatment components) and add-on interventions (i.e. complementing any ongoing individual BPD treatment) were analysed separately. Primary outcomes were BPD severity, self-harm, suicide-related outcomes and psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes were remaining BPD diagnostic criteria, depression and attrition. Results: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials totalling 1870 participants were identified. Among standalone treatments, statistically significant effects of low overall certainty were observed for dialectical behaviour therapy (self-harm: standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.54, P = 0.006; psychosocial functioning: SMD −0.51, P = 0.01) and mentalisation-based treatment (self-harm: risk ratio 0.51, P < 0.0007; suicide-related outcomes: risk ratio 0.10, P < 0.0001). For adjunctive interventions, moderate-quality evidence of beneficial effects was observed for DBT skills training (BPD severity: SMD −0.66, P = 0.002; psychosocial functioning: SMD −0.45, P = 0.002), and statistically significant low-certainty evidence was observed for the emotion regulation group (BPD severity: mean difference −8.49, P < 0.00001), manual-assisted cognitive therapy (self-harm: mean difference −3.03, P = 0.03; suicide-related outcomes: SMD −0.96, P = 0.005) and the systems training for emotional predictability and problem-solving (BPD severity: SMD −0.48, P = 0.002). Conclusions: There is reasonable evidence to conclude that psychotherapeutic interventions are helpful for individuals with BPD. Replication studies are needed to enhance the certainty of findings.
DDC: 150 Psychologie
150 Psychology
610 Medizin
610 Medical sciences
Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department: FB 04 Medizin
Place: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8847
Version: Published version
Publication type: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Document type specification: Scientific article
License: CC BY
Information on rights of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal: The British Journal of Psychiatry
221
3
Pages or article number: 538
552
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publisher place: Cambridge
Issue date: 2022
ISSN: 1472-1465
Publisher DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2021.204
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-H

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
psychotherapies_for_borderlin-20230223095306012.pdf664.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open