Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-84
Autoren: Seth, Anil K.
Titel: The cybernetic Bayesian brain : from interoceptive inference to sensorimotor contingencies
Online-Publikationsdatum: 1-Dez-2016
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
Sprache des Dokuments: Englisch
Zusammenfassung/Abstract: Is there a single principle by which neural operations can account for perception, cognition, action, and even consciousness? A strong candidate is now taking shape in the form of “predictive processing”. On this theory, brains engage in predictive inference on the causes of sensory inputs by continuous minimization of prediction errors or informational “free energy”. Predictive processing can account, supposedly, not only for perception, but also for action and for the essential contribution of the body and environment in structuring sensorimotor interactions. In this paper I draw together some recent developments within predictive processing that involve predictive modelling of internal physiological states (interoceptive inference), and integration with “enactive” and “embodied” approaches to cognitive science (predictive perception of sensorimotor contingencies). The upshot is a development of predictive processing that originates, not in Helmholtzian perception-as-inference, but rather in 20th-century cybernetic principles that emphasized homeostasis and predictive control. This way of thinking leads to (i) a new view of emotion as active interoceptive inference; (ii) a common predictive framework linking experiences of body ownership, emotion, and exteroceptive perception; (iii) distinct interpretations of active inference as involving disruptive and disambiguatory —not just confirmatory —actions to test perceptual hypotheses; (iv) a neurocognitive operationalization of the “mastery of sensorimotor contingencies” (where sensorimotor contingencies reflect the rules governing sensory changes produced by various actions); and (v) an account of the sense of subjective reality of perceptual contents (“perceptual presence”) in terms of the extent to which predictive models encode potential sensorimotor relations (this being “counterfactual richness”). This is rich and varied territory, and surveying its landmarks emphasizes the need for experimental tests of its key contributions.
DDC-Sachgruppe: 100 Philosophie
100 Philosophy
Veröffentlichende Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Organisationseinheit: FB 05 Philosophie und Philologie
Veröffentlichungsort: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-84
URN: urn:nbn:de:hebis:77-publ-553433
Version: Published version
Publikationstyp: Buchbeitrag
Nutzungsrechte: Urheberrechtsschutz
Informationen zu den Nutzungsrechten: https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Quelle: Open MIND
Metzinger, Thomas
Seitenzahl oder Artikelnummer: Kap. 35(T)
Verlag: MIND Group
Verlagsort: Frankfurt am Main
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
URL der Originalveröffentlichung: http://dx.doi.org/10.15502/9783958570108
DOI der Originalveröffentlichung: 10.15502/9783958570108
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:JGU-Publikationen

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
  Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat
Miniaturbild
55343.pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen