Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlessing, Recha-
dc.contributor.authorBuono, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorAhoopai, Majid-
dc.contributor.authorGeyer, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorKnorr, Maike-
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Moritz-
dc.contributor.authorSteven, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorDrosos, Ioannis-
dc.contributor.authorMünzel, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorWenzel, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorGori, Tommaso-
dc.contributor.authorDimitriadis, Zisis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-20T08:33:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-20T08:33:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8614-
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study is to provide evidence on how use of standardized intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use impacts stent size choice in the setting of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to visual estimation. Methods and results: Data of 82 consecutive patients who had successfully undergone IVUS-guided revascularization of CTO at the University Medical Center Mainz were analyzed. Angiography-based stent size prediction for the proximal and distal vessels was compared to the implanted stent diameter after IVUS assessment. Angiography-based stent size prediction for the proximal vessel was 3.09 ± 0.41, whereas IVUS use demonstrated larger vessel diameter, resulting in larger implanted stent diameter (3.24 ± 0.45, p < 0.001). Proximal vessel stent size prediction was underestimated in the majority of patients by angiographic estimation. Angiography-based stent size prediction for the distal vessel was 2.79 ± 0.38, whereas IVUS use demonstrated larger vessel diameter, resulting in larger implanted stent diameter (2.92 ± 0.39, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pre-stent IVUS assessment in CTO PCI provides important information on vessel morphology and size. Angiography-based stent size prediction for the proximal and distal vessels was frequently underestimated, IVUS use demonstrated larger vessel diameter, resulting in significantly larger implanted stent diameter.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491381577de
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleUse of intravascular ultrasound for optimal vessel sizing in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventionen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8598-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicinede
jgu.journal.volume9de
jgu.pages.alternative922366de
jgu.publisher.year2022-
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiersde
jgu.publisher.placeLausannede
jgu.publisher.issn2297-055Xde
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fcvm.2022.922366de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
use_of_intravascular_ultrasou-20230119103241221.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open