Authors:	Hunck, Sandra Engelhard, Kristin Mildenberger, Philipp Kurz, Sandra
Title:	Chancen und Herausforderungen der zunehmenden Digitalisierung der Lehre im Fach Anästhesiologie aus Sicht der Studierenden
Online publication date:	14-Dec-2022
Year of first publication:	2022
Language:	german
Abstract:	Hintergrund Die COVID-19-Pandemie hat die medizinische Lehre weltweit verändert. Seit dem Sommersemester 2020 stehen digitale Lehrformate im Fokus, deren Einsatz zuvor in Intensität und Form in Deutschland sehr unterschiedlich ausgeprägt war. Ziel der Arbeit Die vorliegende Untersuchung stellt die Chancen und Herausforderungen des Einsatzes verschiedener digitaler Lehrformate in der Anästhesiologie aus der Sicht der Studierenden dar. Methode Medizinstudierende der Semester 5–9 im Fachgebiet Anästhesiologie wurden anhand eines 5‑Punkte-Likert-skalierten Fragebogens zu ihren Einstellungen und Erfahrungen mit der digitalen Lehre im Sommersemester 2020 befragt. Untersuchte Lehrformate waren digital aufgezeichnete Vorlesungen sowie Video-Online-Seminare und Praktika. Ergebnisse An der vorliegenden Studie nahmen 141 Studierende teil. Insgesamt haben 80,9 % der Studierenden mehr aufgezeichnete Vorlesungen online angehört, als sie Präsenzvorlesungen besucht hätten, und 84,3 % würden dies auch zukünftig so machen. Obwohl die Studierenden digitale Vorlesungen und Video-Online-Seminare für die Wissensvermittlung als geeignet beurteilten, besteht für die Zukunft der Wunsch, diese zur Wissensvertiefung wieder durch mehr praktischen Präsenzunterricht in Kleingruppen zu ergänzen. Schlussfolgerung Als Vorteil digitaler asynchroner Formate unterstreicht die Studie die Option des zeit- und ortsunabhängigen individuellen Lernens. Als klarer Nachteil dieser Formate ist die mangelnde Interaktion von Studierenden und Dozierenden zu nennen. So erscheint es sinnvoll, die im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie forcierte Digitalisierung für die Wissensvermittlung der für die Anästhesiologie relevanten Inhalte weiterauszubauen und im Sinne einer Blended-Learning-Strategie zu optimieren. Background The coronavirus pandemic caused a sudden change in medical education worldwide and induced a shift towards digital teaching. Previously, most courses were organized for students in physical presence on campus, while a few institutions already complemented these with blended learning methods, combining digital teaching with clinical presence; however, the use of digital teaching was heterogeneous, ranging from the use of PowerPoint slides to the application of virtual patients and telemedicine. Objective This study aimed to identify challenges and opportunities arising from the different tools used in digital teaching, such as recorded lectures or online seminars, and the role of hands-on clinical experience. In addition, the study examined student attitudes and experiences with the nearly all-digital semester beginning in spring 2020. These findings may help to better understand the impact of digital teaching on students and provide guidance on how to optimize digital medical teaching in the future. Methods A questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was developed to assess students’ experiences with digital teaching at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-sectional study. The questionnaire was distributed to all medical students at the University of Mainz, Germany, who attended an anesthesiology course with asynchronously recorded lectures replacing traditional on-campus lectures during the pandemic. A total of 766 students in 4 courses met these criteria and received the online questionnaire for anonymous and voluntary response. Results A total number of 141 students responded, resulting in a response rate of 18.4%. Almost all students had access to the appropriate technology to participate in digital courses and 80.9% indicated seeing more recorded lectures compared to previous face-to-face lectures on campus. Moreover, 67.4% reported that they paused the asynchronous lectures to look up additional information and 95.7% stated that they appreciated the possibility to view lectures regardless of time and location. Hence, 84.3% said they would prefer digital lectures over face-to-face lectures in the future; however, 28.4% missed the interaction with teachers during lectures. Thus, 94.3% of the students appreciated the online seminars in terms of theoretical knowledge but the majority missed the practical aspects in the courses. Overall, 78.0% responded that the digital availability of material and digital teaching formats helped them to enhance their independent learning abilities. Conclusion This study highlights several opportunities and challenges associated with digital teaching. The availability of prerecorded lectures at any time and place seems to facilitate access and increases student motivation. It also promotes individualization of student learning. Main disadvantages are the lack of communication with teachers and other students as well as the missing opportunity to reinforce the theoretical knowledge through application in practical courses, which, however, are essential for medical education. Therefore, a possible solution in the future could be the introduction of the “inverted classroom” concept, as it focuses on application and deepening of clinical skills in interactive classes, while the theoretical knowledge acquisition is taught in a digital teaching environment. The present study proposes the introduction of blended learning concepts to enhance the benefits of digital teaching while minimizing the identified disadvantages.
DDC:	610 Medizin 610 Medical sciences
Institution:	Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Department:	FB 04 Medizin
Place:	Mainz
ROR:	https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI:	http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8254
Version:	Published version
Publication type:	Zeitschriftenaufsatz
License:	CC BY
Information on rights of use:	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal:	Die Anaesthesiologie 71
Pages or article number:	689 696
Publisher:	Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH
Publisher place:	Berlin
Issue date:	2022
ISSN:	2731-6866
Publisher DOI:	10.1007/s00101-022-01102-1
Appears in collections:	DFG-491381577-H