Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7696
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchiegnitz, Eik-
dc.contributor.authorKämmerer, Peer W.-
dc.contributor.authorHellwich, Philipp-
dc.contributor.authorKönig, Jochem-
dc.contributor.authorSagheb, Keyvan-
dc.contributor.authorAl-Nawas, Bilal-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T09:37:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-07T09:37:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7711-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To compare clinical and radiological outcomes of narrow-diameter implants (NDI) placed in pristine bone to standard-diameter implants placed in combination with horizontal bone augmentation procedures (SDI+A) for horizontally deficient alveolar ridges. Material and Methods For this retrospective study, the outcome of 597 NDI (∅ 3.3 mm, 272 patients), inserted in pristine bone, were compared with 180 SDI (∅ 4.1 mm, 83 patients), inserted in combination with horizontal augmentation procedures. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed in patients available for recall. Results After a mean follow-up of 37.6 ± 40 months for the NDI and of 42.4 ± 49 months for the SDI+A, survival rates were 96.1% for NDI and 95.6% for SDI+A. Cumulative 5-year and 10-year implant survival rates were 94.3% and 92.2% for the NDI group and 97.0% and 88.3% for the SDI+A group, indicating no significant difference (p = .89). According to the criteria of Buser et al., an implant success rate of 84.3% was obtained for the NDI and an implant success rate of 81.3% for the SDI+A (p = .79). Regarding oral health-related quality of life, a similar and high patient satisfaction could be observed in both groups. Conclusions NDI without augmentation procedures showed a similar clinical outcome as SDI in combination with augmentation procedures after a follow-up of more than 3 years. Therefore, NDI might be a reasonable alternative in cases of horizontal bone atrophy (no clinical trial registration as patient inclusion started 2003).en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY-NC*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleTreatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges : a retrospective study comparing narrow-diameter implants in pristine bone with standard-diameter implants in augmented boneen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7696-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleClinical oral implants researchde
jgu.journal.volume32de
jgu.journal.issue10de
jgu.pages.start1159de
jgu.pages.end1167de
jgu.publisher.year2021-
jgu.publisher.nameWiley-Blackwellde
jgu.publisher.placeOxfordde
jgu.publisher.issn1600-0501de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1111/clr.13807de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
treatment_concepts_of_horizon-20220902165932792.pdf859.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open