Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7627
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHüsch, Tanja-
dc.contributor.authorHaferkamp, Axel-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorSteffens, Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorFornara, Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorKranz, Jennifer-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T10:01:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-29T10:01:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7641-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Women are underrepresented at scientific conferences, decreasing the visibility of female role models, which are vital for aspiring young female scientists. This investigation aimed to evaluate female representation at the German Society of Urology's (GSoU) annual meeting. Methods The programs of the GSoU meeting of 2011, 2018, 2019 and the virtual conference in 2020 were retrospectively quantified by gender and categorized by chair or speaker, type, and topic of the session. Descriptive analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify gender inequity and variables influencing gender distribution. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 2.504 chairs and speakers were invited to the GSoU meeting in 2018 and 2019. Female speakers or chairs were represented in 17.8%, indicating a gender gap of 64.7%. There were significant differences between session type, topic, and gender distribution for chairs and speakers. The topic surgical techniques were independent variables for both, underrepresented female chairs and speakers, respectively (p < 0.001). Vocational policy and plenary session were not represented by any female chair in 2011, 2018, and 2019. In comparison, the gender gap in 2011 was 74.2%, indicating a gap reduction of 1.2% per year. In a selected virtual program in 2020, the gender gap increased to 70.4%. Conclusion There is still a significant discrepancy between gender representation at the GSoU annual meetings, and gender equity is currently not expected before 50 years. Future efforts should address the implementation of established guidelines for achieving gender equity at urological conferences.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleGender gap at a large European urological congress : still at the beginningen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7627-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleWorld journal of urologyde
jgu.journal.volume40de
jgu.pages.start257de
jgu.pages.end262de
jgu.publisher.year2022-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerde
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin u.a.de
jgu.publisher.issn1433-8726de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
gender_gap_at_a_large_europea-20220826151310375.pdf809.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open