Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7561
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTagkalos, Evangelos-
dc.contributor.authorSluis, Pieter Christiaan van der-
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Eren-
dc.contributor.authorBerlth, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorStaubitz, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorGockel, Ines-
dc.contributor.authorHillegersberg, Richard van-
dc.contributor.authorLang, Hauke-
dc.contributor.authorGrimminger, Peter Philipp-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T10:38:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-16T10:38:33Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7575-
dc.description.abstractBackground For patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a circular stapled anastomosis, the optimal diameter of the used circular stapler to restore continuity is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the 25 mm stapled versus the 28 mm stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, focusing on anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic strictures. Methods Between February 2008 and June 2019, 349 consecutive patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction and circular stapled anastomosis. Patient characteristics and postoperative results, such as anastomotic insufficiency rates, postoperative anastomotic stricture rates, time to anastomotic stricture rate, and the number of dilatations, were recorded in a prospective database and analyzed. Results In 222 patients (64%), the 25 mm circular stapler was used and in 127 patients (36%) the 28 mm circular stapler was used. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Anastomotic insufficiency rates were comparable between the 25 mm (12%) and the 28 mm groups (11%) (p = 0.751). There were no differences between postoperative anastomotic strictures in the 25 mm (14%) and the 28 mm groups (14%) (p = 0.863). Within patients with postoperative anastomotic strictures, a median number of 2 dilatations were observed in each group (p = 0.573) without differences in the time to first diagnosis (p = 0.412). Conclusion There were no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and postoperative anastomotic stricture rates between the 25 mm and the 28 mm circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Both the 25 mm and 28 mm stapler can be safely used to create a circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis to restore continuity after esophagectomy.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleThe circular stapled esophagogastric anastomosis in esophagectomy : no differences in anastomotic insufficiency and stricture rates between the 25 mm and 28 mm circular stapleren_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7561-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleJournal of gastrointestinal surgeryde
jgu.journal.volume25de
jgu.pages.start2242de
jgu.pages.end2249de
jgu.publisher.year2021-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerde
jgu.publisher.placeNew York, NYde
jgu.publisher.issn1873-4626de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s11605-020-04895-xde
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
the_circular_stapled_esophago-20220815145741343.pdf268.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open