Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6427
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRiedinger, Miriam-
dc.contributor.authorNagels, Arne-
dc.contributor.authorWerth, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorScharinger, Mathias-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T10:54:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-02T10:54:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/6437-
dc.description.abstractIn vowel discrimination, commonly found discrimination patterns are directional asymmetries where discrimination is faster (or easier) if differing vowels are presented in a certain sequence compared to the reversed sequence. Different models of speech sound processing try to account for these asymmetries based on either phonetic or phonological properties. In this study, we tested and compared two of those often-discussed models, namely the Featurally Underspecified Lexicon (FUL) model (Lahiri and Reetz, 2002) and the Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework (Polka and Bohn, 2011). While most studies presented isolated vowels, we investigated a large stimulus set of German vowels in a more naturalistic setting within minimal pairs. We conducted an mismatch negativity (MMN) study in a passive and a reaction time study in an active oddball paradigm. In both data sets, we found directional asymmetries that can be explained by either phonological or phonetic theories. While behaviorally, the vowel discrimination was based on phonological properties, both tested models failed to explain the found neural patterns comprehensively. Therefore, we additionally examined the influence of a variety of articulatory, acoustical, and lexical factors (e.g., formant structure, intensity, duration, and frequency of occurrence) but also the influence of factors beyond the well-known (perceived loudness of vowels, degree of openness) in depth via multiple regression analyses. The analyses revealed that the perceptual factor of perceived loudness has a greater impact than considered in the literature and should be taken stronger into consideration when analyzing preattentive natural vowel processing.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizin Mainzde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc400 Sprachede_DE
dc.subject.ddc400 Languageen_GB
dc.titleAsymmetries in accessing vowel representations are driven by phonological and acoustic properties : neural and behavioral evidence from natural German minimal pairsen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6427-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 05 Philosophie und Philologiede
jgu.organisation.number7920-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleFrontiers in human neurosciencede
jgu.journal.volume15de
jgu.pages.alternative612345de
jgu.publisher.year2021-
jgu.publisher.nameFrontiers Research Foundationde
jgu.publisher.placeLausannede
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.612345de
jgu.publisher.issn1662-5161de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode400de
jgu.publisher.doi10.3389/fnhum.2021.612345-
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
riedinger_miriam-asymmetries_in-20211028110320791.pdf2.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open