Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuemmler, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorZiebart, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorOtt, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDirvonskis, Dagmar-
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Erik Kristoffer-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T09:17:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-23T09:17:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/5795-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Efficient airway management to facilitate tracheal intubation encompasses essential skills in anaesthesiologic and intensive care. The application of flexible fibreoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways has been identified as the recommended method in various international guidelines. However, providing the opportunity to adequately train residents can be challenging. Using large animals for practice during ongoing studies could help to improve this situation, but there is no recent data on fibreoptic intubation in swine available. METHODS Thirty male German landrace pigs were anesthetized, instrumented and randomized into two groups. The animals were either intubated conventionally using direct laryngoscopy or a single-use flexible video-endoscope. The intervention was carried out by providers with 3 months experience in conventional intubation of pigs and a brief introduction into endoscopy. Intubation attempts were supervised and aborted, when SpO2 dropped below 93%. After three failed attempts, an experienced supervisor intervened and performed the intubation. Intubation times and attempts were recorded and analysed. RESULTS Flexible fibreoptic intubation showed a significantly higher success rate in first attempt endotracheal tube placement (75% vs. 47%) with less attempts overall (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.043). Conventional intubation was faster (42 s ± 6 s vs. 67 s ± 10s, P < 0.001), but showed a higher complication rate and more desaturation episodes during the trial. CONCLUSIONS Flexible fibreoptic intubation in swine is feasible and appears to be a safer and more accessible method for inexperienced users to learn. This could not only improve resident training options in hospitals with animal research facilities but might also prevent airway complications and needless animal suffering.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleFlexible fibreoptic intubation in swine : improvement for resident training and animal safety alikeen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5786-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleBMC anesthesiologyde
jgu.journal.volume20de
jgu.pages.alternative206de
jgu.publisher.year2020-
jgu.publisher.nameBioMed Centralde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01127-2de
jgu.publisher.issn1471-2253de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s12871-020-01127-2
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
ruemmler_robert-flexible_fibre-20210421120336880.pdf674.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open