Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5775
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStege, Henner-
dc.contributor.authorBradfish, F.-
dc.contributor.authorFleischer, Maria Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorMohr, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorUgurel, Selma-
dc.contributor.authorTerheyden, P.-
dc.contributor.authorThiem, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKiecker, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorLeiter, U.-
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Jürgen C.-
dc.contributor.authorGrabbe, Stephan-
dc.contributor.authorLoquai, Carmen-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-11T07:30:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-11T07:30:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/5784-
dc.description.abstractSignificant progress has been made in the treatment of advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) by establishing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Tumor progression, durable response, or adverse events may lead to ICI discontinuation in MCC patients. If in these patients tumor progression occurs, the question remains if re-induction with ICI achieves renewed tumor response. This retrospective multicenter study evaluated patients in with re-induction of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy for advanced MCC. Clinical data were extracted at treatment initiation, tumor response, treatment cessation, and subsequent tumor response to re-induction. Eight patients from seven centers (mean age 67.8 years) were included. The median duration of initial therapy with anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 was 9.6 months (2–21 months). Two patients achieved complete response (CR), four patients partial response (PR), one patient stable disease (SD), while in one patient progressive disease (PD) occurred as best overall response (BOR) to ICI. Reason for discontinuation of ICI was PD in three patients and severe adverse events in five patients. Following a median anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy-free interval of 9.5 months (3–18 months), re-induction with ICI therapy was initiated. Five of eight patients (62.5%) achieved an objective response upon re-induction, while in three patients, no response could be observed. Notably, adverse events, which had led to the discontinuation of the first ICI treatment line, were not observed upon re-induction. The initial response to immune checkpoint inhibitors seems to be an important marker for successful re-induction. Interestingly, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were not observed during re-induction.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleRetrospective multicenter analysis of the outcome of a re-induction with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced Merkel cell carcinomaen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-5775-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.number2700-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleSN comprehensive clinical medicinede
jgu.journal.volume2de
jgu.pages.start2202de
jgu.pages.end2207de
jgu.publisher.year2020-
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer International Publishingde
jgu.publisher.placeChamde
jgu.publisher.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00488-6de
jgu.publisher.issn2523-8973de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s42399-020-00488-6
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
Appears in collections:JGU-Publikationen

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
stege_h._m.-retrospective_-20210420114755285.pdf489.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open