Bonfils intubation fibrescope : use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscope

dc.contributor.authorLimbach, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorOtt, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGriesinger, Jan
dc.contributor.authorJahn-Eimermacher, Antje
dc.contributor.authorPiepho, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T09:05:32Z
dc.date.available2022-07-12T09:05:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A variety of instruments are used to perform airway management by tracheal intubation. In this study, we compared the MacIntosh balde (MB) laryngoscope with the Bonfils intubation fibrescope as intubation techniques. The aim of this study was to identify the technique (MB or Bonfils) that would allow students in their last year of medical school to perform tracheal intubation faster and with a higher success probability. Data were collected from 150 participants using an airway simulator [‘Laerdal Airway Management Trainer’ (Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway)]. The participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of techniques to use. Four consecutive intubation ‘trials’ were performed with each technique. These trials were evaluated for differences in the following categories: the ‘time to successful ventilation‘, ‘success probability’ within 90 s,’time to visualisation’ of the vocal cords (glottis), and ‘quality of visualisation’ according to the Cormack and Lehane score (C&L, grade 1–4). The primary endpoint was the ‘time to successful ventilation‘in the fourth and final trial. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the ‘time to successful ventilation’ between the two techniques in trial 4 (‘time to successful ventilation’: median: MB: 16 s, Bonfils: 14 s, p = 0.244). However, the ‘success probability’ within 90 s was higher when using a Macintosh blade than when using a Bonfils (95 vs. 87 %). The glottis could be better visualised when using a Bonfils (C&L score of 1 (best view): MB: 41 %, Bonfils: 93 %), but visualisation was achieved more rapidly when using a Macintosh blade (median: ‘time to visualisation’: MB: 6 s, Bonfils: 8 s, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The time to ventilation using the MacIntosh blade and Bonfils mainly did to differ, however success probabilities and time to visualisation primary favoured the MacIntosh blade as intubation technique, although the Bonfils seem to have a steeper learning curve. The Bonfils is still a promising intubation technique and might be easier to learn as the MB, at least in a manikin.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7379
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7393
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleBonfils intubation fibrescope : use in simulation-based intubation training for medical students in comparison to MacIntosh laryngoscopeen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.titleBMC Research Notesde
jgu.journal.volume9de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternativeArt. 127de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2de
jgu.publisher.issn1756-0500de
jgu.publisher.nameBioMed Centralde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1937-2de
jgu.publisher.year2016
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
opus.affiliatedOtt, Thomas
opus.date.modified2018-08-23T08:22:12Z
opus.identifier.opusid56323
opus.institute.number0418
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Klinik für Anästhesiologiede_DE
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bonfils_intubation_fibrescope-20220710234115746.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: