Anionic ring-opening polymerization of epoxides: kinetics, reactivity ratios, and renewable monomer strategies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date issued

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Reuse License

Description of rights: InC-1.0
Item type: Item , DissertationAccess status: Open Access ,

Abstract

Anionic ring-opening polymerization (AROP) of epoxides is a fundamental method for developing innovative and customized materials. Established for more than a century, it is widely used in both industry and academia. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), with its exceptional aqueous solubility, enables the formation of amphiphilic block copolymers that compatibilize hydrophobic molecules with water. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic comonomers can be varied over a vast range towards the desired application. Statistical copolymerization of epoxides allows for combining the properties of different comonomers, with ethylene oxide commonly used due to its hydrophilic nature. In recent years, the synthesis of bio-based compounds from renewable and abundant resources has gained significant attention. Terpenoids provide an accessible platform for synthesizing a variety of glycidyl ethers, offering structural diversity and modifiability for creating customized materials. Fatty alcohols complement this by providing linear hydrophobic monomers, which can be subsequently modified if a double bond is present. The copolymerization of epoxide monomers requires detailed investigations into incorporation preferences to understand the resulting structure-property relationships. This thesis presents a comprehensive review of the existing literature on epoxide copolymerization and explores the copolymerization of various monomers suited for developing innovative materials. Particular emphasis is placed on the synthesis and inquiry of bio-based monomers. Chapter 2 provides a general introduction to copolymerization, focusing on the underlying kinetic aspects. It presents the official terminology for copolymers and reviews the commonly used but imprecise term "random copolymer", offering a more accurate definition. Distinct mathematical models applicable to describing copolymerization are discussed, along with recommendations for their use. Copolymers with a gradient distribution of comonomers are highlighted as a class at the boundary between random and block copolymers. Depending on the copolymerization method, conventional or monomer-activated anionic ring-opening polymerization, control over the incorporation preferences is allowed within certain limits. The centerpiece of this chapter represents the tables of copolymerization behavior of all available epoxide comonomer combinations gathered from the literature. Chapter 3 investigates how polymerization conditions influence the incorporation preferences of ethylene oxide (EO) and glycidyl methyl ether (GME). Copolymers of EO and GME, a “dimeric isomer” of EO, are explored as a potential alternative to PEG for biomedical applications. Variables such as solvent choice can shift the incorporation of preferences of EO and GME from a random copolymerization to one with a slight gradient. This shift is significant for synthesizing copolymers with specific monomer distributions, as anti-PEG antibodies bind to certain motifs of consecutive EO units. The crystallinity of the bulk material depends on the monomer distribution, which is crucial for applications requiring amorphous polymers, such as solid-state batteries. Chapter 4 examines the influence of copolymerization conditions on the well-established EO and propylene oxide (PO) comonomer pair, which has been used industrially for decades. Despite its decades-long use, comprehensive data on melting points and aqueous solubility are unavailable. Even small variations in incorporation preferences impact aqueous properties. PO is incorporated slower than EO, leading to pronounced gradient formations. Copolymers with a steeper gradient were better soluble in water compared to those with a smoother gradient. Chapter 5 explores bio-based terpenyl glycidyl ethers, which offer a renewable alternative to conventional petro-based monomers, contributing to the goal of decarbonizing the chemical industry. The copolymerization of short- to medium-chain acyclic terpenyl glycidyl ethers with EO was investigated. Despite the structural diversity of these monomers, similar incorporation preferences with EO were observed, although the more apolar compounds exhibited slower incorporation rates. The double bonds of the terpenyl glycidyl ethers were functionalized by thiolene click reaction using 2-mercaptoethanol as a model compound, making these materials suitable for introducing virtually any functional group for tailor-made applications. Reduction of the double bonds with diimide enabled subsequent saturation of the side chains, making these materials less prone to aging. Chapter 6 focuses on synthesizing oleyl glycidyl ether (OlGE) from oleyl alcohol and epichlorohydrin. Similar to terpenyl glycidyl ethers, monomers derived from fatty alcohols serve as valuable resources for hydrophobic monomers. Their linear structure allows saturated long-chain variants to solidify at room temperature, while medium-chain or cis-unsaturated variants remain liquid. Despite its highly apolar and bulky side chain, OlGE exhibited only a slightly lower incorporation preference when copolymerized with EO. Block and statistical copolymers of OlGE and EO were investigated for their micellization behavior. By incorporating just a few mol% of this hydrophobic comonomer with a high molar mass, a wide range of hydrophilic-lipophilic balances could be achieved. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) revealed the formation of micelles, which assembled into larger aggregates. The double bond in OlGE was accessible to thiol-ene click reactions and reduction via diimide, allowing partial or complete reduction of the side chains. This modification enabled the fine-tuning of melting points to fall within the physiological range, offering customizable material properties for biomedical applications.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Relationships

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By