Dissimilar ferric derisomaltose formulations : in vitro comparisons between an originator and its intended similars

dc.contributor.authorLangguth, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Reetesh
dc.contributor.authorTulpule, Sameer
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Martin
dc.contributor.authorAuerbach, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T06:58:41Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T06:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground The complex nature of intravenous (IV) iron formulations makes manufacturing and characterising similars challenging. This study examined whether simple in vitro tests can distinguish the high-dose IV iron formulation, Monofer® (ferric derisomaltose [FDI]), from the first intended copies of FDI, Rapifer® (FDI intended similar A [FDIIS-A]) and Tosiron® (FDI intended similar B [FDIIS-B]), approved in India and Pakistan, respectively. Neither intended similar is available in Europe or the United States. Methods Iron content, pH, density, non-volatile residue, carbohydrate content, molecular weight distribution, complex robustness (measured using acid hydrolysis half-life [t½]) and free (dialysable) iron content were examined. Mean results from three batches of FDIIS-A were compared with mean values calculated from three batches of Monofer®. Due to product withdrawal, only one batch of FDIIS-B was available for comparison with Monofer®. Results Iron content was similar for all formulations (∼100 mg/mL). The chromatograms (obtained using gel permeation chromatography) of FDIIS-A and FDIIS-B differed from that of Monofer®. FDIIS-A was substantially less robust than Monofer® (t½: 15 h versus 40.3 h); t½ for FDIIS-B was not tested. Free iron content was substantially higher in FDIIS-A (0.091 % w/v) and FDIIS-B (1.0 % w/v) versus Monofer® (<0.003 % w/v). Where tested, remaining parameters varied between the formulations (insufficient sample quantities prevented all tests being conducted for all intended similars). For all tests, greater inter-batch variability was seen for FDIIS-A versus Monofer®. Conclusions Simple in vitro tests demonstrated that, aside from total iron content, the first intended similars of FDI bear little resemblance to their originator drug. It is clear that the efficacy and safety profile of Monofer® cannot be extrapolated to the two intended similars. The results call for increased regulatory scrutiny of intended IV iron similars.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-12882
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/12903
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc540 Chemiede
dc.subject.ddc540 Chemistry and allied sciencesen
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen
dc.titleDissimilar ferric derisomaltose formulations : in vitro comparisons between an originator and its intended similarsen
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz
jgu.journal.titleEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics
jgu.journal.volume203
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 09 Chemie, Pharmazie u. Geowissensch.
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number7950
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative114426
jgu.publisher.doi10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114426
jgu.publisher.eissn1873-3441
jgu.publisher.nameElsevier
jgu.publisher.placeNew York, NY
jgu.publisher.year2024
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode540
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaften
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific article
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.type.versionPublished version

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dissimilar_ferric_derisomalto-20250728085841438342.pdf
Size:
1.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections