Reproducibility assessment of rapid strains in cardiac MRI: Insights and recommendations for clinical application

dc.contributor.authorHalfmann, Moritz C.
dc.contributor.authorHopman, Luuk H.G.A.
dc.contributor.authorKörperich, Hermann
dc.contributor.authorBlaszczyk, Edyta
dc.contributor.authorGröschel, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSchulz-Menger, Jeanette
dc.contributor.authorSalatzki, Janek
dc.contributor.authorAndré, Florian
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, Silke
dc.contributor.authorEmrich, Tilman
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T11:44:12Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T11:44:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose Studies have shown the incremental value of strain imaging in various cardiac diseases. However, reproducibility and generalizability has remained an issue of concern. To overcome this, simplified algorithms such as rapid atrioventricular strains have been proposed. This multicenter study aimed to assess the reproducibility of rapid strains in a real-world setting and identify potential predictors for higher interobserver variation. Methods A total of 4 sites retrospectively identified 80 patients and 80 healthy controls who had undergone cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at their respective centers using locally available scanners with respective field strengths and imaging protocols. Strain and volumetric parameters were measured at each site and then independently re-evaluated by a blinded core lab. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess inter-observer agreement. In addition, backward multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for higher inter-observer variation. Results There was excellent agreement between sites in feature-tracking and rapid strain values (ICC ≥ 0.96). Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias. Bi-atrial feature-tracking and rapid strains showed equally excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.96) but broader limits of agreement (≤18.0 % vs. ≤3.5 %). Regression analysis showed that higher field strength and lower temporal resolution (>30 ms) independently predicted reduced interobserver agreement for bi-atrial strain parameters (ß = 0.38, p = 0.02 for field strength and ß = 0.34, p = 0.02 for temporal resolution). Conclusion Simplified rapid left ventricular and bi-atrial strain parameters can be reliably applied in a real-world multicenter setting. Due to the results of the regression analysis, a minimum temporal resolution of 30 ms is recommended when assessing atrial deformation.en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-12871
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/12892
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen
dc.titleReproducibility assessment of rapid strains in cardiac MRI: Insights and recommendations for clinical applicationen
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz
jgu.journal.issue174
jgu.journal.titleEuropean journal of radiology
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizin
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative111386
jgu.publisher.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111386
jgu.publisher.eissn0720-048X
jgu.publisher.nameElsevier Science
jgu.publisher.placeAmsterdam [u.a.]
jgu.publisher.year2024
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaften
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific article
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.type.versionPublished version

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
reproducibility_assessment_of-20250725134412618581.pdf
Size:
2.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections