Distress screening in patients with high-grade glioma : diagnostic accuracy in relation to a structured clinical interview in a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorKuchen, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSinger, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorSchranz, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorDoerner, Lorenz
dc.contributor.authorRieger, David
dc.contributor.authorSteinbach, Joachim P.
dc.contributor.authorRonellenfitsch, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorVoss, Martin
dc.contributor.authorKessler, Almuth F.
dc.contributor.authorNickl, Vera
dc.contributor.authorMisch, Martin
dc.contributor.authorOnken, Julia Sophie
dc.contributor.authorRapp, Marion
dc.contributor.authorNadji-Ohl, Minou
dc.contributor.authorMehlitz, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorMeixensberger, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorFehrenbach, Michael Karl
dc.contributor.authorKeric, Naureen
dc.contributor.authorRingel, Florian
dc.contributor.authorCoburger, Jan
dc.contributor.authorWeiß Lucas, Carolin
dc.contributor.authorWehinger, Jens
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt-Graf, Friederike
dc.contributor.authorTatagiba, Marcos
dc.contributor.authorTabatabai, Ghazaleh
dc.contributor.authorHippler, Melina
dc.contributor.authorRenovanz, Mirjam
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-21T13:42:32Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose Structured clinical interviews, such as the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), are considered the gold standard for diagnosing mental disorders but are challenging in routine clinical use due to their length. Therefore, screening instruments to identify the need for further assessment are required. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (DT) screens for psychological distress, while the Emotional Functioning (EF) scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) assesses emotional functioning. Both are frequently used in clinical routine. Additionally, three brief screening questions (TSQ), specifically developed for patients with glioma and integrated into doctor–patient consultations, may also be used for screening. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the three tools to identify patients with psychiatric comorbidities as diagnosed by the SCID. Methods Using data from glioma patients treated at 13 German hospitals participating in a cluster-randomized trial, discriminative abilities were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs). Confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated, and hypothesis tests were conducted using bootstrapping. Results Of the 691 patients interviewed, 31% presented with at least one mental disorder. The EF scale demonstrated the best discriminative ability (AUC 0.70, 95% CI: 0.66–0.74), followed by the DT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI: 0.62–0.76), and the TSQ total score (AUC 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66). Conclusion While all three tools performed better than random chance, none demonstrated convincing discriminative ability in identifying psychiatric comorbidities. In practice, screening tools can identify a substantial proportion of patients with mental disorders, however at the cost of a considerable number of false negatives.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-15195
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/15216
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleDistress screening in patients with high-grade glioma : diagnostic accuracy in relation to a structured clinical interview in a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde_DE
jgu.apc.netprice2453,72
jgu.apc.price2625,48
jgu.apc.taxrate7
jgu.apc.transformationcontractSpringer (DEAL)
jgu.dfg.year2025
jgu.identifier.uuidc84e764b-0ee8-4975-9b9b-2e39560fb4c4
jgu.journal.titleSupportive care in cancer
jgu.journal.volume33
jgu.nationalcurrency.eur2453,72
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde_DE
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainzde_DE
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative737
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00520-025-09810-1
jgu.publisher.eissn1433-7339
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin, Heidelberg
jgu.publisher.year2025
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccessen_GB
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende_DE
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articleen_GB
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTexten_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
distress_screening_in_patient-2026072115423204795.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.14 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections