Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia : the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol

dc.contributor.authorKriege, Marc
dc.contributor.authorAlflen, Christian
dc.contributor.authorTzanova, Irene
dc.contributor.authorSchmidtmann, Irene
dc.contributor.authorPiepho, Tim
dc.contributor.authorNoppens, Rüdiger
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:20:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:20:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The direct laryngoscopy technique using a Macintosh blade is the first choice globally for most anaesthetists. In case of an unanticipated difficult airway, the complication rate increases with the number of intubation attempts. Recently, McGrath MAC (McGrath) video laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for securing an airway by tracheal intubation because it allows the visualisation of the glottis without a direct line of sight. Several studies and case reports have highlighted the benefit of the video laryngoscope in the visualisation of the glottis and found it to be superior in difficult intubation situations. The aim of this study was to compare the first-pass intubation success rate using the (McGrath) video laryngoscope compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy in surgical patients. Methods and analysis The EMMA trial is a multicentre, open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring tracheal intubation are randomly allocated to either the McGrath video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. The expected rate of successful first-pass intubation is 95% in the McGrath group and 90% in the Macintosh group. Each group must include a total of 1000 patients to achieve 96% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Successful intubation with the first attempt is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints are the time to intubation, attempts for successful intubation, the necessity of alternatives, visualisation of the glottis using the Cormack & Lehane score and percentage of glottic opening score and definite complications. Ethics and dissemination The project was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state and Westphalia-Lippe. The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7967
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7982
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleEvaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia : the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocolen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue8de
jgu.journal.titleBMJ opende
jgu.journal.volume7de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternativee016907de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016907de
jgu.publisher.issn2044-6055de
jgu.publisher.nameBMJ Publishing Groupde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016907de
jgu.publisher.year2017
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
opus.affiliatedKriege, Marc
opus.affiliatedAlflen, Christian
opus.affiliatedSchmidtmann, Irene
opus.affiliatedNoppens, Rüdiger
opus.date.modified2018-03-16T09:42:08Z
opus.identifier.opusid57985
opus.institute.number0424
opus.institute.number0418
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Institut für Med. Biometrie, Epidemologie und Informatikde_DE
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Klinik für Anästhesiologiede_DE
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
evaluation_of_the_mcgrath_mac-20220925144053400.pdf
Size:
574.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: