Is noninvasive hemoglobin measurement suitable for children undergoing preoperative anesthesia consultation?

Abstract

Preoperative anemia in children is a significant clinical concern requiring precise diagnosis. Although traditional blood sample collection is effective, it poses challenges because of children’s aversion and technical difficulties. Therefore, this study explores the suitability of noninvasive hemoglobin measurements in children during preoperative anesthesia consultation. Noninvasive hemoglobin measurement (SpHb®; Masimo) in children aged ≤ 17 years was performed during preoperative anesthesia consultation and compared with laboratory hemoglobin (labHb) levels. SpHb was measured in 62 children (median age: 6 years, standard deviation [SD] ± 5.3) without adverse effects but was unsuccessful in one child. The bias, limits of agreement, and root mean square error between SpHb and labHb were 0.3, −2.26– +2.8, and 1.3 g/dl, respectively. LabHb demonstrated a significant regression relationship with R2 of 0.359. LabHb was associated with a negative effect on bias [− 0.443 (CI 95: − 0.591– − 0.153, P < 0.001)], i.e., SpHb tends to underestimate labHb for high labHb values. The retest reliability between two consecutive SpHb measurements was 0.727 (P < 0.001). Double measurement of SpHb, age, weight, sex, heart rate, and perfusion index had no significant effects on accuracy. Using SpHb, a specificity of 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI 95]: 87.3%–99.5%) and a sensitivity of 57.1% (CI 95: 18.4%–90.1%) were observed. Based on adapted cut-off values for SpHb (age-dependent cut-off values plus 0.8 g/dl), a sensitivity of 100% (CI 95: 64.6%–100%) was achieved for the investigated study collective. SpHb measurement in children is a quick procedure. The accuracy of hemoglobin measurement is insufficient for the diagnosis of anemia. Thus, whether the calculated cut-off SpHb values of this study collective can be considered for anemia screening in pediatric patients undergoing preoperative anesthesia consultation should be confirmed. Trial registration number and date of registration: This prospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03586141).