A questionnaire-based survey on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for patients with STIC in Germany

dc.contributor.authorvan der Ven, Josche
dc.contributor.authorLinz, Valerie Catherine
dc.contributor.authorAnic, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Mona Wanda
dc.contributor.authorLoewe, Amelie
dc.contributor.authorKrajnak, Slavomir
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorKommoss, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSchmalfeldt, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorSehouli, Jalid
dc.contributor.authorHasenburg, Annette
dc.contributor.authorBattista, Marco Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T08:05:44Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T08:05:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose Despite the growing understanding of the carcinogenesis of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of the ovary and peritoneum and its precursor lesion serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), evidence-based proven recommendations on the clinical management of patients with STIC are lacking so far. Methods A questionnaire containing 21 questions was developed to explore the clinical experience with patients with the diagnosis of STICs and the diagnostic, surgical and histopathological approaches in Germany. Overall, 540 clinical heads of department in all German gynaecological centres were asked to participate. Results 131 questionnaires (response rate 24.3%) were included in this survey. 45.8% of the respondents had treated one to three STIC patients during their career. 75.6% of the respondents performed opportunistic bilateral salpingectomies during other gynaecological surgeries. Most of the participants (31.3%) started with the SEE-FIM (Sectioning and Extensively Examining the FIMbria) protocol in 2014. It was requested by 39.7% centres for prophylactic salpingectomies, by 13.7% for both prophylactic and opportunistic salpingectomies and by 22.1% for neither of both. 38.2%, 1.5% and 24.4% of the participants would use the laparoscopic, transverse and midline laparotomic approach for a surgical staging procedure, respectively. 25.6% (54.7%) of the respondents recommended a hysterectomy in premenopausal (versus postmenopausal) patients with a STIC, 24.4% (88.4%) a bilateral oophorectomy and 50.0% (4.7%) an affected side oophorectomy (all p values < 0.001). Omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy would be performed by 60.5% (64.0%), 9.3% (11.6%) and 9.3% (11.6%) of respondents in premenopausal (versus postmenopausal) patients (all p values > 0.05). Conclusion Our survey highlights significant inconsistency in the management of patients with STIC. Prospective data are urgently needed to elucidate the clinical impact of a STIC lesion and its clinical management.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)|491381577|Open-Access-Publikationskosten 2022–2024 Universität Mainz - Universitätsmedizin
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-9004
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/9021
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleA questionnaire-based survey on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for patients with STIC in Germanyen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.titleArchives of gynecology and obstetricsde
jgu.journal.volumeVersion of Record (VoR)de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00404-023-06919-8de
jgu.publisher.issn1432-0711de
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerde
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin u.a.de
jgu.publisher.year2023
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaftende
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
a_questionnairebased_survey_o-20230417130908876.pdf
Size:
796.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections