Benchmarking conventional and machine learning segmentation techniques for digital rock physics analysis of fractured rocks

dc.contributor.authorReinhardt, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Arne
dc.contributor.authorSadeghnejad, Saeid
dc.contributor.authorCappuccio, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Pit
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Sascha
dc.contributor.authorEnzmann, Frieder
dc.contributor.authorKersten, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T07:24:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T07:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractImage segmentation remains the most critical step in Digital Rock Physics (DRP) workflows, affecting the analysis of physical rock properties. Conventional segmentation techniques struggle with numerous image artifacts and user bias, which lead to considerable uncertainty. This study evaluates the advantages of using the random forest (RF) algorithm for the segmentation of fractured rocks. The segmentation quality is discussed and compared with two conventional image processing methods (thresholding-based and watershed algorithm) and an encoder–decoder network in the form of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The segmented images of the RF method were used as the ground truth for CNN training. The images of two fractured rock samples are acquired by X-ray computed tomography scanning (XCT). The skeletonized 3D images are calculated, providing information about the mean mechanical aperture and roughness. The porosity, permeability, flow fields, and preferred flow paths of segmented images are analyzed by the DRP approach. Moreover, the breakthrough curves obtained from tracer injection experiments are used as ground truth to evaluate the segmentation quality of each method. The results show that the conventional methods overestimate the fracture aperture. Both machine learning approaches show promising segmentation results and handle all artifacts and complexities without any prior CT-image filtering. However, the RF implementation has superior inherent advantages over CNN. This method is resource-saving (e.g., quickly trained), does not need an extensive training dataset, and can provide the segmentation uncertainty as a measure for evaluating the segmentation quality. The considerable variation in computed rock properties highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate segmentation method.en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7486
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7500
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc550 Geowissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc550 Earth sciencesen_GB
dc.titleBenchmarking conventional and machine learning segmentation techniques for digital rock physics analysis of fractured rocksen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.titleEnvironmental earth sciencesde
jgu.journal.volume81de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 09 Chemie, Pharmazie u. Geowissensch.de
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number7950
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternative71de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s12665-021-10133-7de
jgu.publisher.issn1866-6299de
jgu.publisher.nameSpringerde
jgu.publisher.placeBerlinde
jgu.publisher.year2022
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode550de
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaftende
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
benchmarking_conventional_and-20220729165648776.pdf
Size:
18.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections