Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge : a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans

dc.contributor.authorRoth, Klaus Edgar
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Ramona
dc.contributor.authorSchwand, Eike
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Gerrit Stefen
dc.contributor.authorSchmidtmann, Irene
dc.contributor.authorSariyar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorMaus, Uwe
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T07:28:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T07:28:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: It has been claimed that endoscopic calcaneoplasty offers some advantages over open techniques in the surgical treatment of Haglund’s deformity due to reduced postoperative complications like stiffness and pain. Bony over-resection places patients at risk of these complications. The resulting question with regard to the quantitative differences of the extent of the bone removed using these two techniques has not yet been answered. The purpose of the study was to determine the resection volume of calcaneal bone for open and endoscopic surgical techniques. METHODS: 16 feet obtained from body donors were operated on in equal parts using either open surgical or endoscopic techniques, with the technique selected on a random basis. High-resolution CT scans were obtained before and after the interventional procedure and analysed to obtain 3-D polygon models. Post-operative models were subtracted from pre-operative models to provide the volume change resulting from the intervention. This was then correlated with the bone mineral density (BMD) of the preparation. RESULTS: The extent of bony resection was greater in open surgical techniques than in endoscopic approaches. The average volume of bone resection was 0.80 (±0.34) cm3 in the endoscopic group and 3.04 (±2.91) cm3 in the group that underwent open surgery. After adjustment for bone mineral density the extent of the resection was significantly larger (p = 0.018) in the group undergoing open surgery. The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMD (p > 0.1). The extent of the resection fell by 0.011 cm3 per 1 mg/cm3 areal bone mineral density, i.e., a slightly lower degree of bone resection was associated with a higher bone mineral density. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that the resection volume was adequate to treat the patient’s complaints a smaller resection volume seen in our study using an endoscopic technique might lead to fewer postoperative complaints and faster recovery.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8004
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8019
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen_GB
dc.titleOpen versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge : a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scansen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
jgu.journal.issue1de
jgu.journal.titleJournal of foot and ankle researchde
jgu.journal.volume7de
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizinde
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.alternativeArt. 56de
jgu.publisher.doi10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3de
jgu.publisher.issn1757-1146de
jgu.publisher.nameBioMed centralde
jgu.publisher.placeLondonde
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-014-0056-3de
jgu.publisher.year2014
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610de
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
opus.affiliatedRoth, Klaus Edgar
opus.affiliatedSchwand, Eike
opus.affiliatedSchmidtmann, Irene
opus.date.modified2018-08-09T08:26:28Z
opus.identifier.opusid50544
opus.importsourceWoS
opus.institute.number0424
opus.institute.number0441
opus.institute.number0443
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Institut für Med. Biometrie, Epidemologie und Informatikde_DE
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinikde_DE
opus.organisation.stringFB 04: Medizin: Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinikde_DE
opus.subject.dfgcode00-000
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
open_versus_endoscopic_bone_r-20220925162840207.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: