Losers’ dissent : how election results shape populists’ satisfaction with democracy
Loading...
Date issued
Authors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Reuse License
Abstract
If elections are fair and free, citizens should accept their results regardless of the party or candidate they voted for. The evaluation of democracy should not be tainted by ‘winning’ or ‘losing’ an election. However, research on ‘losers’ consent’ has demonstrated that winners evaluate the functioning of democracy more positively than losers. We argue that the effect of losing is even more pronounced for populist voters. For them, winning and losing is indicative of the functioning of the democratic system itself. To demonstrate this, we use cross-sectional data from the Comparative Studies of Electoral Systems as well as panel data from Germany and the Netherlands for longitudinal analysis. We show that the more populist a citizen is, the stronger the effect losing is on the level of satisfaction with democracy.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Published in
Government & opposition, 60, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2025.10