Quantitative flow ratio or angiography for the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes, a randomized trial

dc.contributor.authorUllrich-Daub, Helen
dc.contributor.authorOlschewski, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorSchnorbus, Boris
dc.contributor.authorBelhadj, Khelifa-Anis
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Till
dc.contributor.authorVosseler, Markus
dc.contributor.authorMünzel, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGori, Tommaso
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-21T06:50:36Z
dc.date.available2025-08-21T06:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes often have multivessel disease (MVD). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an angiography-based technology that may help quantify the functional significance of non-culprit lesions, with the advantage that measurements are possible also once the patient is discharged from the catheterization laboratory. Aim Our two-center, randomized superiority trial aimed to test whether QFR, as compared to angiography, modifies the rate of non-culprit lesion interventions (primary functional endpoint) and improves the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and MVD (primary clinical endpoint). Methods In total, 202 consecutive patients (64 [56–71] years of age, 160 men) with STEMI (n = 69 (34%)), NSTEMI (n = 94 (47%)), or unstable angina (n = 39 (19%)) and MVD who had undergone successful treatment of all culprit lesions were randomized 1:1 to angiography- vs. QFR-guided delayed revascularization of 246 non-culprit stenoses (1.2/patient). Results The proportion of patients assigned to percutaneous intervention was not different between groups (angiography group: 45 (45%) vs. QFR: 56 (55%), P = 0.125; relative risk = 0.80 (0.60–1.06)). At 12 months, a primary clinical endpoint event (composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, and significant angina) occurred in 24 patients (angiography-guided) and 23 patients (QFR-guided; P = 0.637, HR = 1.16 [0.63–2.15]). None of its components was different between groups. Discussion QFR guidance based on analysis of images from the primary intervention was not associated with a difference in the rate of non-culprit lesion staged revascularization nor in the 12-month incidence of clinical events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel disease. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04808310).en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-13137
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/13158
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizinde
dc.subject.ddc610 Medical sciencesen
dc.titleQuantitative flow ratio or angiography for the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes, a randomized trialen
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz
jgu.journal.titleClinical research in cardiology
jgu.journal.volume114
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 04 Medizin
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
jgu.organisation.number2700
jgu.organisation.placeMainz
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485
jgu.pages.end737
jgu.pages.start729
jgu.publisher.doi10.1007/s00392-024-02484-5
jgu.publisher.eissn1861-0692
jgu.publisher.nameSpringer
jgu.publisher.placeBerlin
jgu.publisher.year2024
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess
jgu.subject.ddccode610
jgu.subject.dfgLebenswissenschaften
jgu.type.dinitypeArticleen_GB
jgu.type.resourceText
jgu.type.versionPublished version

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
quantitative_flow_ratio_or_an-20250821085036740746.pdf
Size:
2.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections