Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8932
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpichtinger, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorMarschalik, Patrik-
dc.contributor.authorBaumgartner, Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T11:51:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-19T11:51:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/8948-
dc.description.abstractHomogeneous freezing of solution droplets is an important pathway of ice formation in the tropopause region. The nucleation rate can be parameterized as a function of water activity, based on empirical fits and some assumptions on the underlying properties of super-cooled water, although a general theory is missing. It is not clear how nucleation events are influenced by the exact formulation of the nucleation rate or even their inherent uncertainty. In this study we investigate the formulation of the nucleation rate of homogeneous freezing of solution droplets (1) to link the formulation to the nucleation rate of pure water droplets, (2) to derive a robust and simple formulation of the nucleation rate, and (3) to determine the impact of variations in the formulation on nucleation events. The nucleation rate can be adjusted, and the formulation can be simplified to a threshold description. We use a state-of-the-art bulk ice microphysics model to investigate nucleation events as driven by constant cooling rates; the key variables are the final ice crystal number concentration and the maximum supersaturation during the event. The nucleation events are sensitive to the slope of the nucleation rate but only weakly affected by changes in its absolute value. This leads to the conclusion that details of the nucleation rate are less important for simulating ice nucleation in bulk models as long as the main feature of the nucleation rate (i.e. its slope) is represented sufficiently well. The weak sensitivity of the absolute values to the nucleation rate suggests that the amount of available solution droplets also does not crucially affect nucleation events. The use of only one distinct nucleation threshold function for analysis and model parameterization should be reinvestigated, since it corresponds to a very high nucleation rate value, which is not reached in many nucleation events with low vertical updrafts. In contrast, the maximum supersaturation and thus the nucleation thresholds reached during an ice nucleation event depend on the vertical updraft velocity or cooling rate. This feature might explain some high supersaturation values during nucleation events in cloud chambers and suggests a reformulation of ice nucleation schemes used in coarse models based on a purely temperature-dependent nucleation threshold.en_GB
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc530 Physikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc530 Physicsen_GB
dc.titleImpact of formulations of the homogeneous nucleation rate on ice nucleation events in cirrusen_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8932-
jgu.type.contenttypeScientific articlede
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 08 Physik, Mathematik u. Informatikde
jgu.organisation.number7940-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titleAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsde
jgu.journal.volume23de
jgu.journal.issue3de
jgu.pages.start2035de
jgu.pages.end2060de
jgu.publisher.year2023-
jgu.publisher.nameCopernicus GmbH EGUde
jgu.publisher.placeKatlenburg-Lindaude
jgu.publisher.issn1680-7324de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode530de
jgu.publisher.doi10.5194/acp-23-2035-2023de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
jgu.subject.dfgNaturwissenschaftende
Appears in collections:DFG-491381577-G

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
impact_of_formulations_of_the-20230316100518300.pdf7.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open