Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8371
Autoren: Hüsch, Tanja
Ober, Sita
Haferkamp, Axel
Naumann, Gert
Tunn, Ralf
Saar, Matthias
Kranz, Jennifer
Titel: Comparison of online health information between different digital platforms for pelvic organ prolapse
Online-Publikationsdatum: 9-Jan-2023
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Sprache des Dokuments: Englisch
Zusammenfassung/Abstract: Purpose To identify differences in the content and quality of online health information for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) presented in social media and digital search engines to sustainably enhance patient guidance for adequate platforms for seeking online health information on POP. Methods The platforms Google search, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube were searched for the keyword “pelvic organ prolapse”. Results were categorized as useful, misleading, advertising, and personal experience. Data were categorized into healthcare professionals, professional organisations, industry, patients, and individuals. The readability score and Health On the Net (HON) code seal were analyzed for Google. Descriptive and univariate analysis was performed. Results The source with the highest quantity of useful content was YouTube whereas LinkedIn included mostly advertisement and misleading content. YouTube and Google provided the greatest variety of health information. Social media platforms identified emotional distress and sleep disturbances as a common side effect of POP which is limited considered in clinical practice and provide novel insights of bothersome symptoms related to the disease. The spectrum of different surgical techniques was limited in all platforms. Only 12 (40.0%) were HON-qualified websites with a mean readability score of 10.4 which is considered fairly difficult to read. Conclusion Besides Google search, YouTube was identified as a valuable online source for POP information. However, encompassing information of surgical techniques was limited in all platforms. Urogynecological association may contribute to improve patient information by providing online health information which is complete and easy to understand.
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin
610 Medical sciences
Veröffentlichende Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Organisationseinheit: FB 04 Medizin
Veröffentlichungsort: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8371
Version: Published version
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Nutzungsrechte: CC BY
Informationen zu den Nutzungsrechten: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Zeitschrift: World journal of urology
40
Seitenzahl oder Artikelnummer: 2529
2534
Verlag: Springer
Verlagsort: Berlin u.a.
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI der Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1007/s00345-022-04129-6
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:DFG-491381577-H

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
  Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat
Miniaturbild
comparison_of_online_health_i-20221121131545054.pdf555.12 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen