Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8049
Autoren: Meinhardt, Günter
Meinhardt-Injac, Bozana
Persike, Malte
Titel: On response bias in the face congruency effect for internal and external features
Online-Publikationsdatum: 17-Okt-2022
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Sprache des Dokuments: Englisch
Zusammenfassung/Abstract: Some years ago Cheung et al. (2008) proposed the complete design (CD) for measuring the failure of selective attention in composite objects. Since the CD is a fully balanced design, analysis of response bias may reveal potential effects of the experimental manipulation, the stimulus material, and/or attributes of the observers. Here we used the CD to prove whether external features modulate perception of internal features with the context congruency paradigm (Meinhardt-Injac et al., 2010; Nachson et al., 1995) in a larger sample of N = 303 subjects. We found a large congruency effect (Cohen’s d = 1.78), which was attenuated by face inversion (d = 1.32). The congruency relation also strongly modulated response bias. In incongruent trials the proportion of “different” responses was much larger than in congruent trials (d = 0.79), which was again attenuated by face inversion (d = 0.43). Because in incongruent trials the wholes formed by integrating external and internal features are always different, while in congruent trials same and different wholes occur with the same frequency, a congruency related bias effect is expected from holistic integration. Our results suggest two behavioral markers of holistic processing in the context congruency paradigm: a performance advantage in congruent compared to incongruent trials, and a tendency towards more “different” responses in incongruent, compared to congruent trials. Since the results for both markers differed only quantitatively in upright and inverted presentation, our findings indicate no change of the face processing mode by picture plane rotation. A potential transfer to the composite face paradigm is discussed.
DDC-Sachgruppe: 150 Psychologie
150 Psychology
Veröffentlichende Institution: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Organisationseinheit: FB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sport
Veröffentlichungsort: Mainz
ROR: https://ror.org/023b0x485
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-8049
Version: Published version
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Nutzungsrechte: CC BY
Informationen zu den Nutzungsrechten: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Zeitschrift: Frontiers in human neuroscience
11
Seitenzahl oder Artikelnummer: Art. 494
Verlag: Frontiers Research Foundation
Verlagsort: Lausanne
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
ISSN: 1662-5161
URL der Originalveröffentlichung: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00494
DOI der Originalveröffentlichung: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00494
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
  Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat
Miniaturbild
on_response_bias_in_the_face_-20220925164058706.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen