Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7963
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOberfeld-Twistel, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorStahn, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorKuta, Martha-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:10:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:10:34Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscience.ub.uni-mainz.de/handle/20.500.12030/7978-
dc.description.abstractNonsimultaneous maskers can strongly impair performance in an auditory intensity discrimination task. Using methods of molecular psychophysics, we quantified the extent to which (1) a masker-induced impairment of the representation of target intensity (i.e., increase in internal noise) and (2) a systematic influence of the masker intensities on the decision variable contribute to these effects. In a two-interval intensity discrimination procedure, targets were presented in quiet, and combined with forward maskers. The lateralization of the maskers relative to the targets was varied via the interaural time difference. Intensity difference limens (DLs) were strongly elevated under forward masking but less with contralateral than with ipsilateral maskers. For most listeners and conditions, perceptual weights measuring the relation between the target and masker levels and the response in the intensity discrimination task were positive and significant. Higher perceptual weights assigned to the maskers corresponded to stronger elevations of the intensity DL. The maskers caused only a weak increase in internal noise, unrelated to target level and masker lateralization. The results indicate that the effects of forward masking on intensity discrimination are determined by an inclusion of the masker intensities in the decision variable, compatible with the hypothesis that the impairment in performance is to a large part caused by difficulties in directing selective attention to the targets. The effects of masker lateralization are evidence for top-down influences, and the observed positive signs of the masker weights suggest that the relevant mechanisms are located at higher processing stages rather than in the auditory periphery.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG, Open Access-Publizieren Universität Mainz / Universitätsmedizinde
dc.language.isoengde
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleWhy do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? : Evidence from "molecular psychophysics"en_GB
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatzde
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-7963-
jgu.type.dinitypearticleen_GB
jgu.type.versionPublished versionde
jgu.type.resourceTextde
jgu.organisation.departmentFB 02 Sozialwiss., Medien u. Sportde
jgu.organisation.number7910-
jgu.organisation.nameJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz-
jgu.rights.accessrightsopenAccess-
jgu.journal.titlePLoS onede
jgu.journal.volume9de
jgu.journal.issue6de
jgu.pages.alternativee99745de
jgu.publisher.year2014-
jgu.publisher.namePLoSde
jgu.publisher.placeLawrence, Kan.de
jgu.publisher.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099745de
jgu.publisher.issn1932-6203de
jgu.organisation.placeMainz-
jgu.subject.ddccode150de
opus.date.modified2018-08-09T07:25:13Z
opus.subject.dfgcode02-110
opus.organisation.stringFB 02: Sozialwissenschaften, Medien und Sport: Psychologisches Institutde_DE
opus.identifier.opusid26207
opus.institute.number0204
opus.metadataonlyfalse
opus.type.contenttypeKeinede_DE
opus.type.contenttypeNoneen_EN
opus.affiliatedOberfeld-Twistel, Daniel
opus.affiliatedKuta, Martha
jgu.publisher.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0099745de
jgu.organisation.rorhttps://ror.org/023b0x485-
Appears in collections:DFG-OA-Publizieren (2012 - 2017)

Files in This Item:
  File Description SizeFormat
Thumbnail
why_do_forward_maskers_affect-20220925143703222.pdf446.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open